A prospective study on in-line skating: observational series and survey of active in-line skaters - injuries, protective equipment, and training

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Eine Prospektivstudie zum Inline-Skating: Gruppenanalyse und Beobachtung von aktiven Inline-Skatern - Verletzungen, Schutzausruestung und Training
Autor:Adams, S.L.; Wyte, C.D.; Paradise, M.S.; Castillo, J. del
Erschienen in:Academic emergency medicine
Veröffentlicht:3 (1996), 4, S. 304-311, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1069-6563, 1553-2712
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU199708206931
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Objectives: 1) To assess the relationship between types of injuries incurred and training and protective equipment worn by adults injured while in-line skating; 2) to observe the type and amount of protective equipment worn by in-line skaters while skating; and 3) to survey active in-line skaters about formal training, protective equipment, and history of injuries incurred, and the effect of such injuries on the protective equipment subsequently worn. Methods: A prospective study of consecutive adult patients presenting to the ED for evaluation of in-line skating injuries; a consecutive-series observational study of active in-line skaters to assess protective equipment worn; and a survey of selected active in-line skaters. Eighty-five adult patients were included who presented with a history of injury related to in-line skating to the EDs of an urban academic medical center, a suburban academic-affiliated hospital, and a community hospital. Four hundred eleven active in-line skaters on the Chicago lakefront were observed for protective equipment worn, 91 of whom participated in the survey. Results: Of those presenting to the ED with injuries, only 15% indicated that they had received formal inline skating instruction. Of the ED patients, 50% wore no protective equipment; overall, 6% wore a helmet; 44%, wrist protection; 23%, knee protection; and 19%, elbow protection. Only 2% wore all of the above equipment. The primary mechanism of injury reported was a loss of balance (58%); others included collision with objects (25%), collision with bicycles (11%), and collision with cars (5%). Fractures or dislocations occurred in 48% of the patients; 6% had head injuries necessitating CT scans. Those who wore no protective gear were more likely to require hospital admission. Of the 411 in-line skaters observed, 157 (38%) wore no protective equipment. Compared with the injured group presenting to the ED, fewer observed participants were without protection. Among those surveyed, prior injury was not associated with the subsequent use of protective gear. Conclusion: Patients who present to the ED for evaluation of in-line skating injuries have a high incidence of fractures/dislocations. Few injured or surveyed in-line skaters had formal training. Use of protective equipment by injured skaters was associated with a decreased likelihood of hospitalization. Observed in-line skaters more commonly wore protective gear than did those who presented to the ED with injuries. Verf.-Referat