Evaluation of the VMM turbine for spirometry in the applied physiology laboratory

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Beurteilung der VMM-Turbine fuer die Spirometrie im Labor fuer angewandte Physiologie
Autor:Smith, W. Donald F.; Cunningham, David A.; Paterson, Donald H.; Rechnitzer, Peter A.
Erschienen in:Canadian journal of applied physiology
Veröffentlicht:18 (1993), 3, S. 317-324, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1066-7814, 1543-2718
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU199405071379
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

The volume measurement module turbine (VMM) was evaluated in 51 subjects for spirometry in applied physiology against the Stead-Wells spirometer (SW) and Wright peak flow meter (WM). The volume and flow ranges (VMM) were, FEV1 1.32 to 3.94 L (mean 2.62, confidence interval (CI) 2.46 to 2.78); forced vital capacity (FVC) 1.97 to 5.06 L (mean 3.50, CI 3.29 to 3.71); and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) 290 to 624 L/min (mean 4.34, CI 407 to 461). The mean difference for FEV1 was 0.09 L (CI 0.05 to 0.14), FVC 0.04 L (CI -0.02 to 0.10) and PEFR 18.0 L/min (CI 8.7 to 27.3) less than SW or WM. Bias with FEV1 and FVC was not significant, though PEFR demonstrated a significant proportional error. The repeatability coefficients for FEV1 and FVC were 0.18 and 0.20, comparable to the SW; but for PEFR they were greater, 58.4 versus 33.8 L/min by WM. The VMM turbine is accurate and reliable for the measurements of FEV1 and FVC over the ranges studied; however, care should be taken when interpreting PEFR. Verf.-Referat