Muscle strength from adolescence to adulthood - relationship to muscle fibre types

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Muskelkraft von der Jugend bis zum Erwachsenenalter - Beziehung zu Muskelfasertypen
Autor:Glenmark, B.; Hedberg, G.; Kaijser, L.; Jansson, E.
Erschienen in:European journal of applied physiology
Veröffentlicht:68 (1994), 1, S. 9-19, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1439-6319, 0301-5548
DOI:10.1007/BF00599235
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU199402070517
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

The aim of the present study was to reinvestigate muscle strength and the relationship to muscle fibre and the level of physical activity in adult men and women previously studied during adolescence. A group of 55 men and 26 women were tested for maximal strength (handgrip, Sargent jump and two-hand lift) and completed a questionnaire concerning physical activity during their leisure time (activity index) at the ages of 16 and 27 years. Biopsy specimens were taken from the vastus lateralis and analysed for fibre type and fibre area. The sex differences in strength increased from age 16 to 17 years. Body dimension, sex, percentage of type II, mean fibre area and the activity index contributed to explaining 50-75 of the strength at both ages. Different changes in relationship between fibre type composition and strength in women and men was seen with increasing age. In the women, the relationship between strength and the percentage of type II fibres changed with age (from 16 to 27 years of age) from a positive correlation (only Sargent jump) to negative correlations for all the strength tests, i.e. the more type I fibres the stronger the subject. A positive correlation between strength and the level of physical activity during leisure time was revealed in the women at both ages. The positive correlation between strength and type II fibres in the 16-year-old men had disappeared at age 27. No systematic relationships between strength and the level of physical activity weere seen in the men at either 16 or 27 years of age.