A comparison of isometric strength and dynamic lifting capability

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Ein Vergleich zwischen isometrischer Kraft und dynamischer Hebekapazitaet
Autor:Garg, A.
Erschienen in:Ergonomics
Veröffentlicht:23 (1980), 1, S. 13-27, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0014-0139, 1366-5847
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU198006012193
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

A laboratory study was conducted to determine if job specific static strength can be used to predict dynamic lifting capability (maximum acceptable weight of lift) based on psychophysical methodology. Nine male college students were required to lift three different tote boxes (containers) from a 38 cm height to a 81 cm high table using a semi-squat body posture. For each tote box static strength was measured in three different ways. These were (I) maximum voluntary isometric strength (MVIS) measured at the origin in a vertical direction, (II) MVIS measured close to the body in a vertical direction, and (III) maximum acceptable weight that a subject could hold for 3 s at the origin of the dynamic lift. MVIS at the origin of lift, MVIS close to the bodyand holding the tote box explained 24, 32, and 62 variation, respectively, indynamic lifting capacity. On the average, MVIS at the origin lift, MVIS close to the body and holding the tote box were 46, 120, 72, respectively, of dynamic lifting strength. The findings of this study indicate the need to exerciseextreme care in the use of static strength tests to determine dynamic lifting capability. Changes in MVIS measurement techniques are suggested to better determine dynamic lifting capability. Finally, effects of box size on dynamic and static strengths are discussed. Verf.-Referat