NON-MUSCULOSKELETAL SPORTS MEDICINE LEARNING IN FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCY PROGRAMS

Autor: Pasqualino Caputo; Michael T. Brannick; John Shelton
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2008
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: http://www.jssm.org/vol7/n2/17/v7n2-17text.php
https://doaj.org/toc/1303-2968
1303-2968
https://doaj.org/article/f44fa542b4ae4d7da2d74892ec706598
https://doaj.org/article/f44fa542b4ae4d7da2d74892ec706598
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:f44fa542b4ae4d7da2d74892ec706598

Zusammenfassung

Despite the increasing popularity of primary care sports medicine fellowships, as evidenced by the more than two-fold increase in family medicine sports medicine fellowships from a total of 31 accredited programs during the 1998/1999 academic year (ACGME, 1998) to 63 during the 2003/2004 academic year (ACGME, 2006), there are few empirical studies to support the efficacy of such programs. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have been conducted to assess the impact of primary care sports medicine fellowships on family medicine residents' learning of non-musculoskeletal sports medicine topics. Rigorous evaluations of the outcomes of such programs are helpful to document the value of such programs to both the lay public and interested medical residents. In order to evaluate such programs, it is helpful to apply the same objective standards to residents trained across multiple programs. Hence, we would like to know if there is a learning effect with respect to non-musculoskeletal sports medicine topics identified on yearly administered American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) in-training exams (ITE) to family medicine residents in family medicine residency programs in the United States with and without primary care sports medicine fellowship programs. Review and approval for the research proposal was granted by the ABFM, who also allowed access to the required data. Permission to study and report only non-musculoskeletal sports medicine topics excluding musculoskeletal topics was granted at the time due to other ongoing projects at the ABFM involving musculoskeletal topics. ABFM allowed us access to examinations from 1998 to 2003. We were given copies of each exam and records of responses to each item (correct or incorrect) by each examinee (examinees were anonymous) for each year.For each year, each examinee was classified by the ABFM as either (a) belonging to a program that contained a sports medicine fellowship, or (b) not belonging to a program that contained a sports medicine fellowship. In order to ...