Pilot testing of the Czech versions of the Coaching Behavior Assessment Questionnaire structure [Pilotní testování struktury české verze dotazníku Coaching Behavior Assessment Questionnaire]

Autor: Martin Musálek; Veronika Baláková
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2012
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: http://www.gymnica.upol.cz/index.php/gymnica/article/view/321
https://doaj.org/toc/1212-1185
https://doaj.org/toc/1213-8312
1212-1185
1213-8312
https://doaj.org/article/e868de3456cd4c9881b2ce2f31ca9387
https://doaj.org/article/e868de3456cd4c9881b2ce2f31ca9387
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:e868de3456cd4c9881b2ce2f31ca9387

Zusammenfassung

BACKGROUND : In the sports environment, the opinion that the leadership style of the coach plays an essential role in achieving team success is generally accepted (Amorose & Horn, 2001). Scott Martin and Kelly Barnes in 1999 created Coaching Behavior Assessment Questionnaire, based on CBAS (Smith et al., 1977) and LSS (Chelladurai & Saleh, 1978, 1980). Currently in the Czech Republic, there is no diagnostic tool that would address the effectiveness of the coach. OBJECTIVE : The purpose of this pilot study was to translate and evaluate the structure of CBAQ by method of structural equation modeling for population of children in age 10 - 16. METHODS : For translation of the questionnaire we utilized a modified direct translation method (Behling & Law, 2000). A total of 100 participants age 10 to 16, female 63 (mean age 13.02, SD = 2.10), male 37 (mean age 13.27, SD = 1.37) completed the CBAQ. For data analysis we applied both exploratory and confirmation factor analysis approaches. RESULTS : The original model was tested to verify the structural theory and diagnosis quality of this tool. Results of the original CBAQ 12-factor model showed poor fit of the underaverage values RMSEA on the level 0.082, CFI on the level 0.600 and lack coefficients of generic reliability. After reanalyzing the data we established a modified 5-factor structure of CBAQ. This 5-factor model with restricted numbers of items gave the best values of fit RMSEA = 0.056, CFI = 0.964 and acceptable values of generic reliability. CONCLUSIONS : This study had pilot character and we were aware of problems with loosing information due to very restricted numbers of items in modified version, however it is suggested that final 5-factor version with 15 items could made basis for future full standardized Czech version of CBAQ. [ VÝCHODISKA : Ve sportovním prostředí je obecně uznáván názor, že trenér hraje důležitou roli při dosahování týmového úspěchu (Amorose & Horn, 2011). Scott Martin a Kelly Barnes vytvořili v roce 1999 dotazník ...