Calibration and Cross-Validation of Accelerometery for Estimating Movement Skills in Children Aged 8–12 Years

Autor: Michael J. Duncan; Alexandra Dobell; Mark Noon; Cain C. T. Clark; Clare M. P. Roscoe; Mark A. Faghy; David Stodden; Ryan Sacko; Emma L. J. Eyre
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2020
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/10/2776
https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8220
doi:10.3390/s20102776
1424-8220
https://doaj.org/article/bff6acdefc5c4a08a84f9cd7e969b330
https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102776
https://doaj.org/article/bff6acdefc5c4a08a84f9cd7e969b330
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:bff6acdefc5c4a08a84f9cd7e969b330

Zusammenfassung

(1) Background: This study sought to calibrate triaxial accelerometery, worn on both wrists, waist and both ankles, during children’s physical activity (PA), with particular attention to object control motor skills performed at a fast and slow cadence, and to cross-validate the accelerometer cut-points derived from the calibration using an independent dataset. (2) Methods: Twenty boys (10.1 ±1.5 years) undertook seven, five-minute bouts of activity lying supine, standing, running (4.5kmph −1 ) instep passing a football (fast and slow cadence), dribbling a football (fast and slow cadence), whilst wearing five GENEActiv accelerometers on their non-dominant and dominant wrists and ankles and waist. VO 2 was assessed concurrently using indirect calorimetry. ROC curve analysis was used to generate cut-points representing sedentary, light and moderate PA. The cut-points were then cross-validated using independent data from 30 children (9.4 ± 1.4 years), who had undertaken similar activities whilst wearing accelerometers and being assessed for VO 2 . (3) Results: GENEActiv monitors were able to discriminate sedentary activity to an excellent level irrespective of wear location. For moderate PA, discrimination of activity was considered good for monitors placed on the dominant wrist, waist, non-dominant and dominant ankles but fair for the non-dominant wrist. Applying the cut-points to the cross-validation sample indicated that cut-points validated in the calibration were able to successfully discriminate sedentary behaviour and moderate PA to an excellent standard and light PA to a fair standard. (4) Conclusions: Cut-points derived from this calibration demonstrate an excellent ability to discriminate children’s sedentary behaviour and moderate intensity PA comprising motor skill activity.