Developing the Adversity Quotient of Mathayomsuksa 3 Students using the Integrated Group Counseling Program

Autor: Pantheetra Samart; Araya Piyakun; Songsak Phusee-orn
Sprache: Thailändisch
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: https://edu.msu.ac.th/journal/home/journal_file/382.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1905-9922
1905-9922
https://doaj.org/article/b59fb51c903542b9a9b13d2699647b35
https://doaj.org/article/b59fb51c903542b9a9b13d2699647b35
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:b59fb51c903542b9a9b13d2699647b35

Zusammenfassung

The purposes of this study were (1) to study the definitions, and components of the adversity quotient ; (2) to develop the integrated group counseling program ; and, (3) to compare the results of using the integrated group counseling program to develop the adversity quotient of students. The samples of study consisted of 16 students who enrolled in Mathayomsuksa 3 in an academic year 2015 at Mahasarakham University Demonstration School (secondary). They were randomly selected and divided into two groups: an experimental group and a control group, each of which contained 8 students. The instruments were the 5 rating scale adversity quotient test, integrated group counseling program, behavioral observation and recording form. The data were analyzed by using the Friedman Test, the Wilcoxon Match Pair Signed – Ranks Test and the Mann - Whitney U – Test, respectively. The results of this study indicated that the adversity quotient was defined as the expression of the students on understanding, embracing and responsibility to the adversity, planning and controlling to deal the adversity with patience, perseverance and overcoming the adversity There were four components of the adversity quotient, that is, controlling, responsibility, adversity accessing and analyzing, and motivation and patience. These components were put in the integrated group counseling program to develop the adversity quotient of students. This program was validated by the experts with known appropriate values of 4.00 to 4.80 and standard deviation values of 0.00 to 0.89. After this program was implemented, it was found that the mean scores of the adversity quotient in the experimental group after participating in the program were higher than those before participating in the program at the statistically significance level of .05. When considering the retention behaviors, it was found that the mean scores of the adversity quotient in the experimental group during the follow-up 1 month after the intervention were not different from those after ...