CPIRD: A successful Thai programme to produce clinically competent medical graduates [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5i3]

Autor: Yanhua Yi; Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong; Hutcha Sriplung; Chulalak Rueanarong
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2015
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: http://f1000research.com/articles/4-158/v1
https://doaj.org/toc/2046-1402
2046-1402
doi:10.12688/f1000research.6638.1
https://doaj.org/article/25898c3f041f477797871d4cb68b26ee
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6638.1
https://doaj.org/article/25898c3f041f477797871d4cb68b26ee
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:25898c3f041f477797871d4cb68b26ee

Zusammenfassung

The programme titled “Collaborative Project to Increase Production of Rural Doctors” (CPIRD) is a rural medical education project launched in 1994 in Thailand. This study aimed to compare the academic performances in medical study over five years and the pass rates in national medical license examinations (MLE) between students enrolled in CPIRD and two other tracks. Grade point average (GPA) over five years and results of MLEs for four cohorts of students enrolled from 2003 to 2006 in Prince of Songkla University were collected from the registration department. A longitudinal analysis was used to compare the GPA over time for medical students enrolled in CPIRD and those from the national and direct regional tracks through generalized estimating equation (GEE) models. The MLE pass rates were compared using chi-square and fisher's exact tests as appropriate. Female students dominated the CPIRD group. GPAs in the first three years in the CPIRD group were significantly lower than those of the other two groups, this disparity narrowed in the fourth and fifth years. For step one of the MLE (basic sciences), cohorts 2003 and 2006 of the CPIRD group had a significantly lower pass rate than the other two groups but there was no significant difference in cohort 2004 and cohort 2005. The CPIRD step two and three MLE pass rates were not significantly different from the national track in all cohorts and lower than the direct track only for step two in cohort 2003 and step three in cohort 2006. The step three pass rate of the CPIRD group in cohort 2004 was significantly higher than the other two tracks. Despite weaker competency in basic science, the CPIRD was successful in forming clinical competency.