Functional Outcomes of Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Autor: Stuart Michnick MD; Michael Brage MD; Alexander Lauder MD
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011417S000294
https://doaj.org/toc/2473-0114
2473-0114
doi:10.1177/2473011417S000294
https://doaj.org/article/110c546ffe5d4c0e8992af3c99b1cd8b
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011417S000294
https://doaj.org/article/110c546ffe5d4c0e8992af3c99b1cd8b
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:110c546ffe5d4c0e8992af3c99b1cd8b

Zusammenfassung

Category: Ankle, Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Ankle arthritis treatment options have advanced over the recent years to include total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). There are known long term consequences of ankle arthroplasty such as aseptic loosening and infection. As the popularity of ankle arthroplasty increases, the need for revision total ankle arthroplasty is also increasing. There is a paucity of reported functional outcomes for revision ankle arthroplasty in the literature. This study aims to assess the functional outcomes following revision TAA and compare these with functional outcomes for patients following primary TAA. Our hypothesis is that patients with revision TAA will perform more poorly on functional tests than patients with a primary TAA. Methods: This is a non-randomized prospective and retrospective review. All patients who underwent revision TAA with a modern implant at our institution were included in a retrospective cohort analysis. Additionally, patients who underwent primary TAA with a modern implant were also included as a separate group. Included patients had complete records following TAA with a minimum of one-year follow-up from the time of surgery. Functional outcomes were measured in terms of patient self-reported questionnaires administered via mail survey. Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores were utilized to assess patient functional outcomes. Data was analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test and an independent-t test to determine if there was a significant difference between each study population. A total of 44 patients who underwent a revision TAA were identified and 24 returned surveys. 89 men and women were identified and 43 returned a survey. Results: When evaluating SF-36 survey results between primary and revision TAA, a statistically significant correlation was found in the physical functioning (p<0.01), physical role functioning (p=0.01), vitality (p=0.02), social functioning (p=0.04) and bodily pain (p<0.01) categories. The ...