Health-related quality of life and self-related health in patients with type 2 diabetes: Effects of group-based rehabilitation versus individual counselling

Autor: Vadstrup Eva S; Frølich Anne; Perrild Hans; Borg Eva; Røder Michael
Sprache: Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2011
Quelle: Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
Online Zugang: http://www.hqlo.com/content/9/1/110
https://doaj.org/toc/1477-7525
doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-110
1477-7525
https://doaj.org/article/010864be39db4f25b2659f21f0d5be0f
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-110
https://doaj.org/article/010864be39db4f25b2659f21f0d5be0f
Erfassungsnummer: ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:010864be39db4f25b2659f21f0d5be0f

Zusammenfassung

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes can seriously affect patients' health-related quality of life and their self-rated health. Most often, evaluation of diabetes interventions assess effects on glycemic control with little consideration of quality of life. The aim of the current study was to study the effectiveness of group-based rehabilitation versus individual counselling on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and self-rated health in type 2 diabetes patients. Methods We randomised 143 type 2 diabetes patients to either a six-month multidisciplinary group-based rehabilitation programme including patient education, supervised exercise and a cooking-course or a six-month individual counselling programme. HRQOL was measured by Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) and self-rated health was measured by Diabetes Symptom Checklist - Revised (DCS-R). Results In both groups, the lowest estimated mean scores of the SF36 questionnaire at baseline were "vitality" and "general health". There were no significant differences in the change of any item between the two groups after the six-month intervention period. However, vitality-score increased 5.2 points ( p = 0.12) within the rehabilitation group and 5.6 points ( p = 0.03) points among individual counselling participants. In both groups, the highest estimated mean scores of the DSC-R questionnaire at baseline were "Fatigue" and "Hyperglycaemia". Hyperglycaemic and hypoglycaemic distress decreased significantly after individual counselling than after group-based rehabilitation (difference -0.3 points, p = 0.04). No between-group differences occurred for any other items. However, fatigue distress decreased 0.40 points within the rehabilitation group ( p = 0.01) and 0.34 points within the individual counselling group ( p < 0.01). In the rehabilitation group cardiovascular distress decreased 0.25 points ( p = 0.01). Conclusions A group-based rehabilitation programme did not improve health-related quality of life and self-rated health more ...