Effect of internal vs. external focus of attention instructions on countermovement jump variables in NCAA division I student-athletes

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Die Auswirkung interner versus externer Aufmerksamkeitsfokusinstruktionen auf die Variablen des Countermovement-Sprungs bei Studentensportlern der Division I der NCAA
Autor:Kershner, Alexandra L.; Fry, Andrew C.; Cabarkapa, Dimitrije
Erschienen in:Journal of strength and conditioning research
Veröffentlicht:33 (2019), 6, S. 1467-1473, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1064-8011, 1533-4287
DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003129
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201907004990
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

The purpose of this study was compare the effect of internal and external focus of attention instructions on force-time characteristics of the countermovement jump (CMJ) in collegiate student-athletes. Forty-three resistance-trained men (x ± SD; age = 20 ± 1.5 years) on an NCAA Division I baseball team volunteered to participate in this study. Each participant performed a total of 16 CMJs on a force platform while holding a wooden dowel on their shoulders to eliminate arm swing. Force and power parameters such as jump height (JH), peak velocity (PV), and mean concentric velocity (MCV) were calculated from force-time and position data. Paired-sample t -tests and Cohen’s d effect sizes were used to examine differences between conditions. When subjects were instructed using an external focus, they demonstrated significantly (p < 0.05) greater JH, PV, and MCV compared with jumps performed with the internal focus (external JH = 48.0 ± 5.6 cm, internal JH = 46.4 ± 5.4 cm; external PV = 3.6 ± 0.3 m•s −1, internal PV = 3.5 ± 0.3 m•s −1; and external MCV = 2.31 ± 0.22 m•s −1, internal MCV = 2.25 ± 0.23 m•s −1). It is interesting to note that there was superior recall of the internal instructions during the manipulation checks that may suggest that the subjects consciously processed these instructions to a greater extent and reduced internal condition performance. These results indicate that instructions can alter the efficiency and performance of a skill. According to the literature and this study, if an optimum performance metric is desired, external focus of attention instructions should be used.