Reliability and validity of the adapted Resistance Training Skills Battery for Children
Gespeichert in:
Deutscher übersetzter Titel: | Reliabilität und Validität der adaptierten "Resistance Training Skills Battery for Children" |
---|---|
Autor: | Furzer, Bonnie J.; Bebich-Philip, Marc D.; Wright, Kemi E.; Reid, Siobhan L.; Thornton, Ashleigh L. |
Erschienen in: | Journal of science and medicine in sport |
Veröffentlicht: | 21 (2018), 8, S. 822-827, Lit. |
Format: | Literatur (SPOLIT) |
Publikationstyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
Medienart: | Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource |
Sprache: | Englisch |
ISSN: | 1440-2440, 1878-1861 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.12.010 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | |
Erfassungsnummer: | PU201810007545 |
Quelle: | BISp |
TY - JOUR AU - Furzer, Bonnie J. A2 - Furzer, Bonnie J. A2 - Bebich-Philip, Marc D. A2 - Wright, Kemi E. A2 - Reid, Siobhan L. A2 - Thornton, Ashleigh L. DB - BISp DP - BISp KW - Kind KW - Krafttraining KW - Muskelkraft KW - Reliabilität KW - Sportmotorik KW - Testbatterie KW - Testverfahren KW - Untersuchung, empirische KW - Validität LA - eng TI - Reliability and validity of the adapted Resistance Training Skills Battery for Children TT - Reliabilität und Validität der adaptierten "Resistance Training Skills Battery for Children" PY - 2018 N2 - Objectives: Resistance training (RT) is emerging as a training modality to improve motor function and facilitate physical activity participation in children across the motor proficiency spectrum. Although RT competency assessments have been established and validated among adolescent cohorts, the extent to which these methods are suitable for assessing children’s RT skills is unknown. This project aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the adapted Resistance Training Skills Battery for Children (RTSBc), in children with varying motor proficiency. Design: Repeated measures design with 40 participants (M age = 8.2 ± 1.7 years) displaying varying levels of motor proficiency. Methods: Participants performed the adapted RTSBc on two occasions, receiving a score for their execution of each component, in addition to an overall RT skill quotient child (RTSQc). Cronbach’s alpha, intra-class correlation (ICC), Bland–Altman analysis, and typical error were used to assess test–retest reliability. To examine construct validity, exploratory factor analysis was performed alongside computing correlations between participants’ muscle strength, motor proficiency, age, lean muscle mass, and RTSQc. Results: The RTSBc displayed an acceptable level of internal consistency (alpha = 0.86) and test–retest reliability (ICC range = 0.86–0.99). Exploratory factor analysis supported internal test structure, with all six RT skills loading strongly on a single factor (range 0.56–0.89). Analyses of structural validity revealed positive correlations for RTSQc in relation to motor proficiency (r = 0.52, p < 0.001) and strength scores (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Analyses revealed support for the construct validity and test–retest reliability of the RTSBc, providing preliminary evidence that the RTSBc is appropriate for use in the assessment of children’s RT competency. L2 - https://www.jsams.org/article/S1440-2440(17)31868-6/fulltext L2 - https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.12.010 DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.12.010 SP - S. 822-827 SN - 1440-2440 JO - Journal of science and medicine in sport IS - 8 VL - 21 M3 - Elektronische Ressource (online) M3 - Gedruckte Ressource ID - PU201810007545 ER -