Comparison of compressive myofascial release and the graston technique for improving ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Vergleich der Anspannungs- Entspannungsmethode und der Graston-Technik zur Verbesserung der Sprunggelenkbeweglichkeit
Autor:Stanek, Justin; Sullivan, Taylor; Davis, Samantha
Erschienen in:Journal of athletic training
Veröffentlicht:53 (2018), 2, S. 160-167, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1062-6050, 0160-8320, 1938-162X
DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-386-16
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201804002792
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

Context: Restricted dorsiflexion (DF) at the ankle joint can cause acute and chronic injuries at the ankle and knee. Myofascial release and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) techniques have been used to increase range of motion (ROM); however, evidence directly comparing their effectiveness is limited.
Objective: To compare the effects of a single session of compressive myofascial release (CMR) or IASTM using the Graston Technique (GT) on closed chain ankle-DF ROM.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Laboratory.
Patients or Other Participants: Participants were 44 physically active people (53 limbs) with less than 30° of DF.
Intervention(s): Limbs were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: control, CMR, or GT. Both treatment groups received one 5-minute treatment that included scanning the area and treating specific restrictions. The control group sat for 5 minutes before measurements were retaken.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Standing and kneeling ankle DF were measured before and immediately after treatment. Change scores were calculated for both positions, and two 1-way analyses of variance were conducted.
Results: A difference between groups was found in the standing (F2,52 = 13.78, P = .001) and kneeling (F2,52 = 5.85, P = .01) positions. Post hoc testing showed DF improvements in the standing position after CMR compared with the GT and control groups (both P = .001). In the kneeling position, DF improved after CMR compared with the control group (P = .005).
Conclusions: Compressive myofascial release increased ankle DF after a single treatment in participants with DF ROM deficits. Clinicians should consider adding CMR as a treatment intervention for patients with DF deficits.