Influence of a cluster set configuration on the adaptations to short-term power training

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Der Einfluss einer Cluster-Satz-Konfiguration auf die Anpassungen an kurzzeitiges Schnellkrafttraining
Autor:Morales-Artacho, Antonio J.; Padial, Paulino; García-Ramos, Amador; Pérez-Castilla, Alejandro; Feriche, Belén
Erschienen in:Journal of strength and conditioning research
Veröffentlicht:32 (2018), 4, S. 930-937, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1064-8011, 1533-4287
DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001925
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201804002557
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

This study investigated the effects of a traditional (TT) vs. cluster (CT) resistance training on the lower-body force, velocity, and power output. Nineteen males were allocated to a CT or a TT group and took part of a 3-week resistance training (2 weekly sessions). CT involved 6 sets of 3 × 2 repetitions (30 seconds rest every 2 repetitions and 4 minutes 30 seconds between sets). TT comprised 6 sets of 6 continuous repetitions (5 minutes rest between sets). Before and after the training period, force (F 25, F 50, F 75), velocity (V 25, V 50, V 75), and power (P 25, P 50, P 75) were obtained during the countermovement jump (CMJ) exercise at 3 external loading conditions (25, 50, and 75% of body mass). Individual linear regressions were used to determine the force–velocity profile including the Slope, estimated maximal theoretical force (F 0), velocity (V 0), and power (P 0). After CT, very-likely moderate increments in P 25 were observed compared with TT (p = 0.011, ES = 0.55) because of a very-likely moderate rise in V 25 (p = 0.001, ES = 0.71). No significant differences were observed in any of the F-v profile variables between the TT and CT groups (p ≥ 0.207, ES ≤ 0.31). Our results suggest that 3 weeks of muscle power training including cluster set configurations are more efficient at inducing velocity and power adaptations specific to the training load.