Is inertial flywheel resistance training superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength? : a systematic review with meta-analyses
Deutscher übersetzter Titel: | Ist das Krafttraining mit dem Schwungrad gegenüber dem Schwerkraftabhängigen bei der Verbesserung der Muskelkraft überlegen? : eine systematische Überprüfung mit Meta-Analysen |
---|---|
Autor: | Vicens-Bordas, Jordi; Estève, E.; Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, Azahara; Bandholm, T. ; Thorborg, K. |
Erschienen in: | Journal of science and medicine in sport |
Veröffentlicht: | 21 (2018), 1, S. 75-83, Lit. |
Format: | Literatur (SPOLIT) |
Publikationstyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
Medienart: | Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource |
Sprache: | Englisch |
ISSN: | 1440-2440, 1878-1861 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.006 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | |
Erfassungsnummer: | PU201803002265 |
Quelle: | BISp |
Abstract des Autors
Objective: The primary aim of this systematic review was to determine if inertial flywheel resistance training is superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving muscle strength. The secondary aim was to determine whether inertial flywheel resistance training is superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in improving other muscular adaptations.
Design: A systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with no publication date restrictions until November 2016. We performed meta-analyses on randomised and non-randomised controlled trials to determine the standardized mean difference between the effects of inertial flywheel and gravity-dependent resistance training on muscle strength. A total of 76 and 71 participants were included in the primary and secondary analyses, respectively.
Results: After systematic review, we included three randomised and four non-randomised controlled trials. In the primary analysis for the primary outcome muscle strength, the pooled results from randomised controlled trials showed no difference (SMD = −0.05; 95%CI −0.51 to 0.40; p = 0.82; I2 = 0%). In the secondary analyses of the primary outcome, the pooled results from non-randomised controlled trials showed no difference (SMD = 0.02; 95%CI −0.45 to 0.49; p = 0.93; I2 = 0%; and SMD = 0.03; 95%CI −0.43 to 0.50; p = 0.88; I2 = 0%). Meta-analysis on secondary outcomes could not be performed.
Conclusion: Based on the available data, inertial flywheel resistance training was not superior to gravity-dependent resistance training in enhancing muscle strength. Data for other strength variables and other muscular adaptations was insufficient to draw firm conclusions from.