Dazed and confused: sports medicine, conflicts of interest, and concussion management

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Betäubt und verwirrt: Sportmedizin, Interessenskonflikte und Managament von Gehirnerschütterungen
Autor:Partridge, Brad
Erschienen in:Journal of bioethical inquiry
Veröffentlicht:11 (2014), 1, S. 65–74, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1176-7529, 1872-4353
DOI:10.1007/s11673-013-9491-2
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201711009582
Quelle:BISp
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Partridge, Brad
A2  - Partridge, Brad
DB  - BISp
DP  - BISp
KW  - Begriffsbestimmung
KW  - Betreuung, sportmedizinische
KW  - Entwicklung, geschichtliche
KW  - Ethik
KW  - Forschungsstand
KW  - Gehirnerschütterung
KW  - Interessenvertretung
KW  - Neurologie
KW  - Neuropsychologie
KW  - Politik
KW  - Prävention
KW  - Regelwerk
KW  - Schädelhirnverletzung
KW  - Schädelverletzung
KW  - Situationsanalyse
KW  - Sozialethik
KW  - Soziologie
KW  - Spielfähigkeit
KW  - Sportmanagement
KW  - Sportmedizin
KW  - Sportphilosophie
KW  - Sportpolitik
KW  - Untersuchung, vergleichende
LA  - eng
TI  - Dazed and confused: sports medicine, conflicts of interest, and concussion management
TT  - Betäubt und verwirrt: Sportmedizin, Interessenskonflikte und Managament von Gehirnerschütterungen
PY  - 2014
N2  - Professional sports with high rates of concussion have become increasingly concerned about the long-term effects of multiple head injuries. In this context, return-to-play decisions about concussion generate considerable ethical tensions for sports physicians. Team doctors clearly have an obligation to the welfare of their patient (the injured athlete) but they also have an obligation to their employer (the team), whose primary interest is typically success through winning. At times, a team's interest in winning may not accord with the welfare of an injured player, particularly when it comes to decisions about returning to play after injury. Australia's two most popular professional football codes-rugby league and Australian Rules football-have adopted guidelines that prohibit concussed players from continuing to play on the same day. I suggest that conflicts of interest between doctors, patients, and teams may present a substantial obstacle to the proper adherence of concussion guidelines. Concussion management guidelines implemented by a sport's governing body do not necessarily remove or resolve conflicts of interest in the doctor-patient-team triad. The instigation of a concussion exclusion rule appears to add a fourth party to this triad (the National Rugby League or the Australian Football League). In some instances, when conflicts of interest among stakeholders are ignored or insufficiently managed, they may facilitate attempts at circumventing concussion management guidelines to the detriment of player welfare.
L2  - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258702570_Dazed_and_Confused_Sports_Medicine_Conflicts_of_Interest_and_Concussion_Management
L2  - https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11673-013-9491-2
L2  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11673-013-9491-2
DO  - 10.1007/s11673-013-9491-2
SP  - S. 65–74
SN  - 1176-7529
JO  - Journal of bioethical inquiry
IS  - 1
VL  - 11
M3  - Elektronische Ressource (online)
M3  - Gedruckte Ressource
ID  - PU201711009582
ER  -