Urination difficulties during doping controls : an act of rebellion?

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Schwierigkeiten beim Wasserlassen während der Dopingkontrollen : ein Akt der Rebellion?
Autor:Elbe, Anne-Marie; Brand, Ralf
Erschienen in:Journal of clinical sport psychology
Veröffentlicht:8 (2014), 2, S. 204-214, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1932-9261, 1932-927X
DOI:10.1123/jcsp.2014-0022
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201710008805
Quelle:BISp
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Elbe, Anne-Marie
A2  - Elbe, Anne-Marie
A2  - Brand, Ralf
DB  - BISp
DP  - BISp
KW  - Doping
KW  - Dopingbekämpfung
KW  - Dopingkontrolle
KW  - Dopingprävention
KW  - Einstellung
KW  - Einstellung, innere
KW  - Hemmung
KW  - Psychologie
KW  - Sportpsychologie
KW  - Urin
KW  - Urinprobe
KW  - Urinuntersuchung
KW  - Verhaltenspsychologie
LA  - eng
TI  - Urination difficulties during doping controls : an act of rebellion?
TT  - Schwierigkeiten beim Wasserlassen während der Dopingkontrollen : ein Akt der Rebellion?
PY  - 2014
N2  - Urine doping controls have become a regular part of athletes’ lives, and approximately one half of all athletes suffer at least once from urination difficulties during these tests. Previous studies could not satisfactorily explain why athletes are affected. This paper examines the relation between urination difficulties during doping controls and psychological reactance. It is assumed that psychological reactance is positively correlated to urination difficulties. The results are based on a study involving 187 German-speaking athletes participating in elite sports at the national team level. In addition to demographic data and information about doping controls, the Psychogenic Urine Retention during Doping Controls Scale (PURDS) and Therapeutic Reactance Scale (TRS) were used. The results do not confirm our hypothesis and indicate that reactance correlates negatively rather than positively to urination difficulties during doping controls. The results are surprising as they suggest that athletes who show low oppositional potential toward doping rules are most strongly affected. Suggestions for interventions are given.
L2  - https://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2014-0022
L2  - http://journals.humankinetics.com/doi/10.1123/jcsp.2014-0022
DO  - 10.1123/jcsp.2014-0022
SP  - S. 204-214
SN  - 1932-9261
JO  - Journal of clinical sport psychology
IS  - 2
VL  - 8
M3  - Elektronische Ressource (online)
M3  - Gedruckte Ressource
ID  - PU201710008805
ER  -