A comparison of catastrophic injury incidence rates by Provincial Rugby Union in South Africa

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Vergleich der Inzidenz schwerster Verletzungen in der Provincial Rugby Union in Südafrika
Autor:Badenhorst, Marelise; Verhagen, Evert A.L.M.; Mechelen, Willem van; Lambert, Michael I.; Viljoen, Wayne; Readhead, Clint; Baerecke, Gail; Brown, James C.
Erschienen in:Journal of science and medicine in sport
Veröffentlicht:20 (2017), 7, S. 643-647, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1440-2440, 1878-1861
DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2017.01.232
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201709008332
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Objectives: To compare catastrophic injury rates between the 14 South African Provincial Rugby Unions. Design: A prospective, population-based study conducted among all South African Unions between 2008–2014. Methods: Player numbers in each Union were obtained from South African Rugby’s 2013 Census. Catastrophic injuries were analysed from BokSmart’s serious injury database. Incidence rates with 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated. Catastrophic injuries (Acute Spinal Cord Injuries and catastrophic Traumatic Brain Injuries) within Unions were compared statistically, using a Poisson regression with Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) and a 95% confidence level (p < 0.05). Results: Catastrophic injury incidence rates per Union ranged from 1.8 per 100 000 players (95% CI: 0.0–6.5) to 7.9 (95% CI: 0.0–28.5) per 100 000 players per year. The highest incidence rate of permanent outcome Acute Spinal Cord Injuries was reported at 7.1 per 100 000 players (95% CI: 0.0–17.6). Compared to this Union, five (n = 5/14, 36%) of the Unions had significantly lower incidence rates of Acute Spinal Cord Injuries. Proportionately, three Unions had more Acute Spinal Cord Injuries and three other Unions had more catastrophic Traumatic Brain Injuries. Conclusions: There were significant differences in the catastrophic injury incidence rates amongst the Provincial Unions in South Africa. Future studies should investigate the underlying reasons contributing to these provincial differences.