Effects of light-load maximal lifting velocity weight training vs. combined weight training and plyometrics on sprint, vertical jump and strength performance in adult soccer players

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Auswirkungen von Krafttraining mit geringer Last und maximaler Geschwindigkeit vs. kombiniertem Kraft- und Plyometrietraining auf die Sprint-, Vertikalsprung- und Kraftleistung erwachsener Fußballspieler
Autor:Rodríguez-Rosell, David; Torres-Torrelo, Julio; Franco-Márquez, Felipe; González-Suárez, José Manuel; González-Badillo, Juan José
Erschienen in:Journal of science and medicine in sport
Veröffentlicht:20 (2017), 7, S. 695-699, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1440-2440, 1878-1861
DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2016.11.010
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201709008323
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of combined light-load maximal lifting velocity weight training (WT) and plyometric training (PT) with WT alone on strength, jump and sprint performance in semiprofessional soccer players. Design: Experimental, pre-post tests measures. Methods: Thirty adult soccer players were randomly assigned into three groups: WT alone (FSG, n = 10), WT combined to jump and sprint exercises (COM, n = 10) and control group (CG, n = 10). WT consisted of full squat with low load (∼45–60% 1RM) and low volume (4–6 repetitions). Training program was performed twice a week for 6 weeks of competitive season in addition to 4 soccer sessions a week. Sprint time in 10 and 20 m, jump height (CMJ), estimated one-repetition maximum (1RMest) and velocity developed against different absolute loads in full squat were measured before and after training period. Results: Both experimental groups showed significant improvements in 1RMest (17.4–13.4%; p < 0.001), CMJ (7.1–5.2%; p < 0.001), sprint time (3.6–0.7%; p < 0.05–0.001) and force–velocity relationships (16.9–6.1%; p < 0.05–0.001), whereas no significant gains were found in CG. No significant differences were found between FSG and COM. Conclusions: Despite FSG resulted of greater increases in strength variables than COM, this may not translate into superior improvements in the sport-related performance. In fact, COM showed higher efficacy of transfer of strength gains to sprint ability. Therefore, these findings suggest that a combined WT and PT program could represent a more efficient method for improving activities which involve acceleration, deceleration and jumps compared to WT alone.