Systematic review of correlates and determinants of physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Systematische Überprüfung der Korrelate und Determinanten der körperlichen Aktivität bei Personen mit Multipler Sklerose
Autor:Streber, René; Peters, Stefan; Pfeifer, Klaus
Erschienen in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
Veröffentlicht:97 (2016), 4, S. 633-645, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0003-9993, 1532-821X
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.020
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201706004086
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Objective
To review the current evidence regarding correlates and determinants of physical activity (PA) in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS).
Data Sources
PubMed and Scopus (1980 to January 2015) and reference lists of eligible studies.
Study Selection
Eligible studies include adults with multiple sclerosis; have a cross-sectional or prospective observational design; or examine the effect of a theory-based intervention trial on PA, including a mediation analysis. Eligible studies also apply a quantitative assessment of PA and correlates or proposed mediators and are published in English or German language.
Data Extraction
Two reviewers independently evaluated the risk of bias, extracted data, and categorized variables according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
Data Synthesis
Consistency and the direction of associations were evaluated with a semiquantitative approach. Fifty-six publications with data from observational studies and 2 interventional studies provided evidence for 86 different variables. Consistent correlates of PA were the disability level, walking limitations in particular, PA-related self-efficacy, self-regulation constructs, employment status, and educational level. One interventional study provided evidence for a causal relation between self-regulation and PA. However, 59 of the 86 investigated variables in observational studies are based on 1 or 2 study findings, and most results stem from cross-sectional designs.
Conclusions
Beside the importance of the general disability level and walking limitations, the results highlight the importance of personal factors (eg, PA-related self-efficacy, self-regulatory constructs, sociodemographic factors). Limitations and implications of the current review are discussed. Research that is more rigorous is needed to better understand what affects PA in pwMS.