Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices : the example of Optojump

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Messfehler bei der Einschätzung der vertikalen Sprunghöhe anhand der Flugzeit mit Fotozell-Messgeräten : das Beispiel "Optojump"
Autor:Attia, Ahmed; Dhahbi, Wissem; Chaouachi, Anis; Padulo, Johnny; Wong, Del P.; Chamari, Karim
Erschienen in:Biology of sport
Veröffentlicht:34 (2017), 1, S. 63-70, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0860-021X, 2083-1862
DOI:10.5114/biolsport.2017.63735
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201704003052
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Common methods to estimate vertical jump height (VJH) are based on the measurements of flight time (FT) or vertical reaction force. This study aimed to assess the measurement errors when estimating the VJH with flight time using photocell devices in comparison with the gold standard jump height measured by a force plate (FP). The second purpose was to determine the intrinsic reliability of the Optojump photoelectric cells in estimating VJH. For this aim, 20 subjects (age: 22.50±1.24 years) performed maximal vertical jumps in three modalities in randomized order: the squat jump (SJ), counter-movement jump (CMJ), and CMJ with arm swing (CMJarm). Each trial was simultaneously recorded by the FP and Optojump devices. High intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for validity (0.98-0.99) and low limits of agreement (less than 1.4 cm) were found; even a systematic difference in jump height was consistently observed between FT and double integration of force methods (-31% to -27%; p<0.001) and a large effect size (Cohen’s d>1.2). Intra-session reliability of Optojump was excellent, with ICCs ranging from 0.98 to 0.99, low coefficients of variation (3.98%), and low standard errors of measurement (0.8 cm). It was concluded that there was a high correlation between the two methods to estimate the vertical jump height, but the FT method cannot replace the gold standard, due to the large systematic bias. According to our results, the equations of each of the three jump modalities were presented in order to obtain a better estimation of the jump height.