Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance
Gespeichert in:
Deutscher übersetzter Titel: | Nutzen wiederholter Messungen nach ungültiger Ausgangsleistung bei neurokognitiven Tests |
---|---|
Autor: | Schatz, Philip; Kelley, Timothy; Ott, Summer D.; Solomon, Gary S.; Elbin, Robert J.; Higgins, Kate; Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro |
Erschienen in: | Journal of athletic training |
Veröffentlicht: | 49 (2014), 5, S. 659-664, Lit. |
Format: | Literatur (SPOLIT) |
Publikationstyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
Medienart: | Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource |
Sprache: | Englisch |
ISSN: | 1062-6050, 0160-8320, 1938-162X |
DOI: | 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | |
Erfassungsnummer: | PU201505003515 |
Quelle: | BISp |
id |
PU201505003515 |
---|---|
bisp-collection |
db |
format |
Literatur |
last_indexed |
2015-05-05T14:37:41Z |
first_indexed |
2015-05-05T07:45:08Z |
publication_source |
BISp |
subformat |
Zeitschriftenartikel |
hierarchy_top_id |
JO00000000720 |
hierarchy_parent_id |
JOI201400050000720 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of athletic training |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of athletic training, 2014, 5 |
is_hierarchy_id |
PU201505003515 |
is_hierarchy_title |
Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance |
hierarchy_sequence |
0659 |
recordtype |
bisparticle |
publishDate |
2014 |
publishDate_facet |
2014 |
language |
eng |
title |
Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance |
spellingShingle |
Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance Gehirnerschütterung Gehirnerschütterung Kognition Kopfverletzung Leistung, kognitive Sportmedizin Test, kognitiver Testverfahren Untersuchung, empirische Validität |
title_sort |
utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance |
title_short |
Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance |
title_alt |
Nutzen wiederholter Messungen nach ungültiger Ausgangsleistung bei neurokognitiven Tests |
title_alt_lang |
deu |
media_type |
Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource |
city |
Dallas (Tex) |
abstract |
Context: Although the prevalence of invalid baseline neurocognitive testing has been documented, and repeated administration after obtaining invalid results is recommended, no empirical data are available on the utility of repeated assessment after obtaining invalid baseline results. Objective: To document the utility of readministering neurocognitive testing after an invalid baseline test. Design: Case series. Setting: Schools, colleges, and universities. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 156 athletes who obtained invalid results on ImPACT baseline neurocognitive testing and were readministered the ImPACT baseline test within a 2-week period (mean = 4 days). Main Outcome Measure(s): Overall prevalence of invalid results on reassessment, specific invalidity indicators at initial and follow-up baseline, dependent-samples analysis of variance, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results: Reassessment resulted in valid test results for 87.2% of the sample. Poor performance on the Design Memory and Three-Letter subscales were the most common reasons for athletes obtaining an invalid baseline result, on both the initial assessment and the reassessment. Significant improvements were noted on all ImPACT composite scores except for Reaction Time on reassessment. Of note, 40% of athletes showed slower reaction time scores on reassessment, perhaps reflecting a more cautious approach taken the second time. Invalid results were more likely to be obtained by athletes with a self-reported history of attention-deficit disorder or learning disability on reassessments (35%) than on initial baseline assessments (10%). Conclusions: Repeat assessment after the initial invalid baseline performance yielded valid results in nearly 90% of cases. Invalid results on a follow-up assessment may be influenced by a history of attention-deficit disorder or learning disability, the skills and abilities of the individual, or a particular test-taking approach; in these cases, a third assessment may not be useful. Verf.-Referat |
abstract_lang |
eng |
abstract_type |
abstract |
author2 |
Schatz, Philip Kelley, Timothy Ott, Summer D. Solomon, Gary S. Elbin, Robert J. Higgins, Kate Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro |
author_facet |
Schatz, Philip Kelley, Timothy Ott, Summer D. Solomon, Gary S. Elbin, Robert J. Higgins, Kate Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro |
author2-role |
Autor Autor Autor Autor Autor Autor Autor |
author2-authorityid |
P174828 |
author_author_facet |
Schatz, Philip Kelley, Timothy Ott, Summer D. Solomon, Gary S. Elbin, Robert J. Higgins, Kate Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro |
author2-synonym |
Elbin, Robert J. III |
author2_hierarchy_facet |
0/Autor/ 1/Autor/Schatz, Philip/ 0/Autor/ 1/Autor/Kelley, Timothy/ 0/Autor/ 1/Autor/Ott, Summer D./ 0/Autor/ 1/Autor/Solomon, Gary S./ 0/Autor/ 1/Autor/Elbin, Robert J./ 0/Autor/ 1/Autor/Higgins, Kate/ 0/Autor/ 1/Autor/Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro/ |
doi |
10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37 |
spelling |
10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37 1062-6050 0160-8320 1938-162X 1202960-9 Gehirnerschütterung Gehirnerschütterung Kognition Kopfverletzung Leistung, kognitive Sportmedizin Test, kognitiver Testverfahren Untersuchung, empirische Validität cognition cognitive performance cognitive test concussion of the brain coomotio cerebri empirical investigation head injury sports medicine test procedure validity Empirie Empirismus Untersuchung, experimentelle Untersuchung Prozess, kognitiver Funktion, kognitive Prüfungsverfahren Prüfverfahren Testmethode Gültigkeit Gültigkeitskoeffizient Kopfballverletzung Hirnkontusion Medizin Geschichte der Medizin Untersuchung, sportmedizinische Wasserdampf empirical study injury of the head brain concussion cerebral commotion commotio cerebri Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance PU201505003515 201505003515 |
url |
http://natajournals.org/doi/full/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37 http://natajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37 https://dx.doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37 |
url-type |
fulltext fulltext fulltext |
url-free |
0 0 0 |
issn |
1062-6050 0160-8320 1938-162X |
zdb |
1202960-9 |
location_hierarchy_facet |
0/USA/ 1/USA/Texas/ |
topic |
Gehirnerschütterung Gehirnerschütterung Kognition Kopfverletzung Leistung, kognitive Sportmedizin Test, kognitiver Testverfahren Untersuchung, empirische Validität |
topic_facet |
Gehirnerschütterung Gehirnerschütterung Kognition Kopfverletzung Leistung, kognitive Sportmedizin Test, kognitiver Testverfahren Untersuchung, empirische Validität |
topic_en |
cognition cognitive performance cognitive test concussion of the brain coomotio cerebri empirical investigation head injury sports medicine test procedure validity |
topic_en_facet |
cognition cognitive performance cognitive test concussion of the brain coomotio cerebri empirical investigation head injury sports medicine test procedure validity |
synonym |
Empirie Empirismus Untersuchung, experimentelle Untersuchung Prozess, kognitiver Funktion, kognitive Prüfungsverfahren Prüfverfahren Testmethode Gültigkeit Gültigkeitskoeffizient Kopfballverletzung Hirnkontusion Medizin Geschichte der Medizin Untersuchung, sportmedizinische Wasserdampf |
synonym_en |
empirical study injury of the head brain concussion cerebral commotion commotio cerebri |
journal_facet |
Journal of athletic training |
container_title |
Journal of athletic training |
container_volume |
49 |
container_issue |
5 |
container_start_page |
S. 659-664 |
has_references |
1 |
institution |
BISp |
journal_fac |
JO00000000720 |
journal_year |
2014 |
journal_issue |
5 |
_version_ |
1791511652285284352 |
score |
13,546046 |