Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Nutzen wiederholter Messungen nach ungültiger Ausgangsleistung bei neurokognitiven Tests
Autor:Schatz, Philip; Kelley, Timothy; Ott, Summer D.; Solomon, Gary S.; Elbin, Robert J.; Higgins, Kate; Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro
Erschienen in:Journal of athletic training
Veröffentlicht:49 (2014), 5, S. 659-664, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1062-6050, 0160-8320, 1938-162X
DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201505003515
Quelle:BISp
id PU201505003515
bisp-collection db
format Literatur
last_indexed 2015-05-05T14:37:41Z
first_indexed 2015-05-05T07:45:08Z
publication_source BISp
subformat Zeitschriftenartikel
hierarchy_top_id JO00000000720
hierarchy_parent_id JOI201400050000720
hierarchy_top_title Journal of athletic training
hierarchy_parent_title Journal of athletic training, 2014, 5
is_hierarchy_id PU201505003515
is_hierarchy_title Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance
hierarchy_sequence 0659
recordtype bisparticle
publishDate 2014
publishDate_facet 2014
language eng
title Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance
spellingShingle Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance
Gehirnerschütterung
Gehirnerschütterung
Kognition
Kopfverletzung
Leistung, kognitive
Sportmedizin
Test, kognitiver
Testverfahren
Untersuchung, empirische
Validität
title_sort utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance
title_short Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance
title_alt Nutzen wiederholter Messungen nach ungültiger Ausgangsleistung bei neurokognitiven Tests
title_alt_lang deu
media_type Elektronische Ressource (online)
Gedruckte Ressource
city Dallas (Tex)
abstract Context: Although the prevalence of invalid baseline neurocognitive testing has been documented, and repeated administration after obtaining invalid results is recommended, no empirical data are available on the utility of repeated assessment after obtaining invalid baseline results. Objective: To document the utility of readministering neurocognitive testing after an invalid baseline test. Design: Case series. Setting: Schools, colleges, and universities. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 156 athletes who obtained invalid results on ImPACT baseline neurocognitive testing and were readministered the ImPACT baseline test within a 2-week period (mean = 4 days). Main Outcome Measure(s): Overall prevalence of invalid results on reassessment, specific invalidity indicators at initial and follow-up baseline, dependent-samples analysis of variance, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results:  Reassessment resulted in valid test results for 87.2% of the sample. Poor performance on the Design Memory and Three-Letter subscales were the most common reasons for athletes obtaining an invalid baseline result, on both the initial assessment and the reassessment. Significant improvements were noted on all ImPACT composite scores except for Reaction Time on reassessment. Of note, 40% of athletes showed slower reaction time scores on reassessment, perhaps reflecting a more cautious approach taken the second time. Invalid results were more likely to be obtained by athletes with a self-reported history of attention-deficit disorder or learning disability on reassessments (35%) than on initial baseline assessments (10%). Conclusions: Repeat assessment after the initial invalid baseline performance yielded valid results in nearly 90% of cases. Invalid results on a follow-up assessment may be influenced by a history of attention-deficit disorder or learning disability, the skills and abilities of the individual, or a particular test-taking approach; in these cases, a third assessment may not be useful. Verf.-Referat
abstract_lang eng
abstract_type abstract
author2 Schatz, Philip
Kelley, Timothy
Ott, Summer D.
Solomon, Gary S.
Elbin, Robert J.
Higgins, Kate
Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro
author_facet Schatz, Philip
Kelley, Timothy
Ott, Summer D.
Solomon, Gary S.
Elbin, Robert J.
Higgins, Kate
Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro
author2-role Autor
Autor
Autor
Autor
Autor
Autor
Autor
author2-authorityid


P174828



author_author_facet Schatz, Philip
Kelley, Timothy
Ott, Summer D.
Solomon, Gary S.
Elbin, Robert J.
Higgins, Kate
Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro
author2-synonym



Elbin, Robert J. III


author2_hierarchy_facet 0/Autor/
1/Autor/Schatz, Philip/
0/Autor/
1/Autor/Kelley, Timothy/
0/Autor/
1/Autor/Ott, Summer D./
0/Autor/
1/Autor/Solomon, Gary S./
0/Autor/
1/Autor/Elbin, Robert J./
0/Autor/
1/Autor/Higgins, Kate/
0/Autor/
1/Autor/Moser, Rosemarie Scolaro/
doi 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37
spelling 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37
1062-6050
0160-8320
1938-162X
1202960-9
Gehirnerschütterung
Gehirnerschütterung
Kognition
Kopfverletzung
Leistung, kognitive
Sportmedizin
Test, kognitiver
Testverfahren
Untersuchung, empirische
Validität
cognition
cognitive performance
cognitive test
concussion of the brain
coomotio cerebri
empirical investigation
head injury
sports medicine
test procedure
validity
Empirie
Empirismus
Untersuchung, experimentelle
Untersuchung
Prozess, kognitiver
Funktion, kognitive
Prüfungsverfahren
Prüfverfahren
Testmethode
Gültigkeit
Gültigkeitskoeffizient
Kopfballverletzung
Hirnkontusion
Medizin
Geschichte der Medizin
Untersuchung, sportmedizinische
Wasserdampf
empirical study
injury of the head
brain concussion
cerebral commotion
commotio cerebri
Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance
PU201505003515
201505003515
url http://natajournals.org/doi/full/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37
http://natajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37
https://dx.doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.37
url-type fulltext
fulltext
fulltext
url-free 0
0
0
issn 1062-6050
0160-8320
1938-162X
zdb 1202960-9
location_hierarchy_facet 0/USA/
1/USA/Texas/
topic Gehirnerschütterung
Gehirnerschütterung
Kognition
Kopfverletzung
Leistung, kognitive
Sportmedizin
Test, kognitiver
Testverfahren
Untersuchung, empirische
Validität
topic_facet Gehirnerschütterung
Gehirnerschütterung
Kognition
Kopfverletzung
Leistung, kognitive
Sportmedizin
Test, kognitiver
Testverfahren
Untersuchung, empirische
Validität
topic_en cognition
cognitive performance
cognitive test
concussion of the brain
coomotio cerebri
empirical investigation
head injury
sports medicine
test procedure
validity
topic_en_facet cognition
cognitive performance
cognitive test
concussion of the brain
coomotio cerebri
empirical investigation
head injury
sports medicine
test procedure
validity
synonym Empirie
Empirismus
Untersuchung, experimentelle
Untersuchung
Prozess, kognitiver
Funktion, kognitive
Prüfungsverfahren
Prüfverfahren
Testmethode
Gültigkeit
Gültigkeitskoeffizient
Kopfballverletzung
Hirnkontusion
Medizin
Geschichte der Medizin
Untersuchung, sportmedizinische
Wasserdampf
synonym_en empirical study
injury of the head
brain concussion
cerebral commotion
commotio cerebri
journal_facet Journal of athletic training
container_title Journal of athletic training
container_volume 49
container_issue 5
container_start_page S. 659-664
has_references 1
institution BISp
journal_fac JO00000000720
journal_year 2014
journal_issue 5
_version_ 1791511652285284352
score 13,546046