Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Auwirkungen einer pronierten und supinierten Fußstellung auf die statische und dynamische Haltungsstabilität
Autor:Cote, Karen P.; Brunet II, Michael E.; Gansneder, Bruce M.; Shultz, Sandra J.
Erschienen in:Journal of athletic training
Veröffentlicht:40 (2005), 1, S. 41-46, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1062-6050, 0160-8320, 1938-162X
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201011008937
Quelle:BISp
id PU201011008937
bisp-collection db
format Literatur
last_indexed 2013-11-07T08:20:32Z
first_indexed 2010-11-29T09:48:14Z
publication_source BISp
subformat Zeitschriftenartikel
hierarchy_top_id JO00000000720
hierarchy_parent_id JOI200500010000720
hierarchy_top_title Journal of athletic training
hierarchy_parent_title Journal of athletic training, 2005, 1
is_hierarchy_id PU201011008937
is_hierarchy_title Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability
hierarchy_sequence 0041
recordtype bisparticle
publishDate 2005
publishDate_facet 2005
language eng
title Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability
spellingShingle Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability
Analyse, biomechanische
Biomechanik
Fuß
Fußstellung
Fußverletzung
Gleichgewichtsstörung
Gleichgewichtstest
Gleichgewichtsvermögen
Haltungsstabilität
Pronation
Sprunggelenk
Supination
Untersuchung, empirische
title_sort effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability
title_short Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability
title_alt Auwirkungen einer pronierten und supinierten Fußstellung auf die statische und dynamische Haltungsstabilität
title_alt_lang deu
media_type Elektronische Ressource (online)
Gedruckte Ressource
city Dallas (Tex)
abstract Context: The foot is the most distal segment in the lower extremity chain and represents a relatively small base of support on which the body maintains balance (particularly in single-leg stance). Although it seems reasonable that even minor biomechanical alterations in the support surface may influence postural-control strategies, the implications of a hypermobile or hypomobile foot on balance have received little attention to date. Objective: To determine if supinated and pronated foot types influence measures of static and dynamic balance. Design: Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 groups depending on foot type, as defined by navicular-drop measures: pronated (≥10 mm), neutral (5–9 mm), or supinated (≤4 mm). Measures of static and dynamic balance were obtained for each participant and compared across groups. Setting: Sports medicine and athletic training research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Sixteen individuals with pronated (navicular drop = 13.0 ± 3.7 mm), neutral (navicular drop = 6.2 ± 1.1 mm), or supinated (navicular drop = 2.2 ± 1.7 mm) foot postures volunteered to participate in the study. Main Outcome Measure(s): We used the Chattecx Balance System to measure center of balance, stability index, and postural sway during static single-limb stance under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Center of balance was defined as the point on the foot at which the body weight was equally distributed between the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior quadrants and was recorded in centimeters. Stability index was defined as the mean deviation in sway around the center of balance. Postural sway was expressed as the maximum sway distance recorded (cm) in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions. The Star Excursion Balance Test was used to measure dynamic balance, which was reported as the reach distance (cm) in each of the 8 directions tested. The average of 3 trials of each measure was calculated and normalized to the subject's height. Results: We found no difference in center of balance or postural sway as a function of foot type. The stability index was greater in pronators than in supinators, but neither group was different from those with neutral foot types. Dynamic reach differed among groups but only in some directions. Generally, pronators reached farther in the anterior and anterior medial directions and supinators reached farther in the posterior and posterio-lateral directions. In the lateral direction, supinators reached farther than pronators but not farther than neutrals. Conclusions: Our results suggest that postural stability is affected by foot type under both static and dynamic conditions. These differences appear to be related to structural differences as opposed to differences in peripheral input. These effects should be considered when clinicians use such balance measures to assess injury deficits and recovery. Verf.-Referat
abstract_lang eng
abstract_type abstract
author2 Cote, Karen P.
Brunet II, Michael E.
Gansneder, Bruce M.
Shultz, Sandra J.
author_facet Cote, Karen P.
Brunet II, Michael E.
Gansneder, Bruce M.
Shultz, Sandra J.
author2-role Autor
Autor
Autor
Autor
author2-authorityid



author_author_facet Cote, Karen P.
Brunet II, Michael E.
Gansneder, Bruce M.
Shultz, Sandra J.
author2-synonym



author2_hierarchy_facet 0/Autor/
1/Autor/Cote, Karen P./
0/Autor/
1/Autor/Brunet II, Michael E./
0/Autor/
1/Autor/Gansneder, Bruce M./
0/Autor/
1/Autor/Shultz, Sandra J./
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1088344/pdf/i1062-6050-40-1-41.pdf
url-type fulltext
url-free 1
free_access 1
issn 1062-6050
0160-8320
1938-162X
spelling 1062-6050
0160-8320
1938-162X
1202960-9
Analyse, biomechanische
Biomechanik
Fuß
Fußstellung
Fußverletzung
Gleichgewichtsstörung
Gleichgewichtstest
Gleichgewichtsvermögen
Haltungsstabilität
Pronation
Sprunggelenk
Supination
Untersuchung, empirische
ankle joint
balance
balance test
biomechanical analysis
biomechanics
empirical investigation
equilibrium disturbance
foot
foot injury
foot position
postural stability
pronation
supination
Empirie
Empirismus
Untersuchung, experimentelle
Untersuchung
Analyse, methodische
Aufzeichnung, biomechanische
Untersuchung, biomechanische
Bewegung, physikalische
Merkmal, biomechanisches
Biokinematik
Prinzip, biomechanisches
Gleichgewicht
Schwindel
Fuszschaden
Fußknöchel
Knöchel
Fußgelenk
empirical study
disturbance of equilibrium
dysequilibrium
injury of the foot
ankle
Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability
PU201011008937
201011008937
zdb 1202960-9
location_hierarchy_facet 0/USA/
1/USA/Texas/
topic Analyse, biomechanische
Biomechanik
Fuß
Fußstellung
Fußverletzung
Gleichgewichtsstörung
Gleichgewichtstest
Gleichgewichtsvermögen
Haltungsstabilität
Pronation
Sprunggelenk
Supination
Untersuchung, empirische
topic_facet Analyse, biomechanische
Biomechanik
Fuß
Fußstellung
Fußverletzung
Gleichgewichtsstörung
Gleichgewichtstest
Gleichgewichtsvermögen
Haltungsstabilität
Pronation
Sprunggelenk
Supination
Untersuchung, empirische
topic_en ankle joint
balance
balance test
biomechanical analysis
biomechanics
empirical investigation
equilibrium disturbance
foot
foot injury
foot position
postural stability
pronation
supination
topic_en_facet ankle joint
balance
balance test
biomechanical analysis
biomechanics
empirical investigation
equilibrium disturbance
foot
foot injury
foot position
postural stability
pronation
supination
synonym Empirie
Empirismus
Untersuchung, experimentelle
Untersuchung
Analyse, methodische
Aufzeichnung, biomechanische
Untersuchung, biomechanische
Bewegung, physikalische
Merkmal, biomechanisches
Biokinematik
Prinzip, biomechanisches
Gleichgewicht
Schwindel
Fuszschaden
Fußknöchel
Knöchel
Fußgelenk
synonym_en empirical study
disturbance of equilibrium
dysequilibrium
injury of the foot
ankle
journal_facet Journal of athletic training
container_title Journal of athletic training
container_volume 40
container_issue 1
container_start_page S. 41-46
has_references 1
institution BISp
journal_fac JO00000000720
journal_year 2005
journal_issue 1
_version_ 1791512848034168832
score 13,546099