Subtalar joint position during gastrocnemius stretching and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Position des unteren Sprunggelenks während der Dehnung des M. gastrocnemius und Bewegungsausmaß der Dorsalflexion im Sprunggelenk
Autor:Johanson, Marie ; Baer, Jennifer; Hovermale, Holley; Phouthavong, Phouvy
Erschienen in:Journal of athletic training
Veröffentlicht:43 (2008), 2, S. 172-178, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1062-6050, 0160-8320, 1938-162X
DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.172
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201010007972
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

Context: Gastrocnemius stretching exercises often are prescribed as part of the treatment program for patients with overuse injuries associated with limited ankle dorsiflexion. However, little is known about how the position of the subtalar joint during gastrocnemius stretching affects ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM). Objective: To determine the effect of subtalar joint position during gastrocnemius stretching on ankle dorsiflexion ROM. Design: This study was a 3-way mixed-model design. The 3 factors were subtalar joint position (supinated, pronated), lower extremity (experimental, control), and time (pretest, posttest). Lower extremity and time were the repeated measures. Setting: University research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Thirty-three healthy volunteers (29 women, 4 men). Intervention(s): Participants performed a gastrocnemius stretching exercise 2 times daily for 3 weeks with the subtalar joint of the randomly assigned experimental side (dominant or nondominant) in the randomly assigned position (supination or pronation). The contralateral lower extremity served as the control. Main Outcome Measure(s): Before and after the 3-week gastrocnemius stretching program, we used goniometers to measure ankle dorsiflexion ROM in weight-bearing and non–weight-bearing positions with the subtalar joint positioned in anatomic 0°. Results: Ankle dorsiflexion ROM measured in weight-bearing and non–weight-bearing positions increased after the gastrocnemius stretching program (P = .034 and .003, respectively), but the increase in ROM did not differ based on subtalar joint position (P = .775 and .831, respectively). Conclusions: Subtalar joint position did not appear to influence gains in ankle dorsiflexion ROM after a gastrocnemius stretching program in healthy volunteers. Verf.-Referat