United States Army physical readiness training : rationale and evaluation of the physical training doctrine

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Körperliches Bereitschaftstraining in der Armee der USA : Begründung und Evaluation der Doktrin des körperlichen Trainings
Autor:Knapik, Joseph J.; Rieger, William; Palkoska, Frank; Camp, Steven van; Darakjy, Salima
Erschienen in:Journal of strength and conditioning research
Veröffentlicht:23 (2009), 4, S. 1353-1362, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1064-8011, 1533-4287
DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318194df72
Schlagworte:
USA
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201001000483
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

This paper reviews the rationale and evaluations of Physical Readiness Training (PRT), the new U.S. Army physical training doctrine designed to improve soldiers’ physical capability for military operations. The purposes of PRT are to improve physical fitness, prevent injuries, progressively train soldiers, and develop soldiers’ self-confidence and discipline. The PRT follows the principles of progressive overload, regularity, specificity, precision, variety, and balance. Specificity was achieved by examining the standard list of military (warrior) tasks and determining 1) the physical requirements, 2) the fitness components involved, and 3) the training activities that most likely could improve the military tasks. Injury-prevention features include reduced running mileage, exercise variety (cross-training), and gradual, progressive training. In 3 military field studies, the overall adjusted risk of injury was 1.5-1.8 times higher in groups of soldiers performing traditional military physical training programs when compared with groups using a PRT program. Scores on the Army Physical Fitness Test were similar or higher in groups using PRT programs. In an 8-week laboratory study comparing PRT with a weightlifting/running program, both programs resulted in major improvements in militarily relevant tasks (e.g., 3.2-km walk/run with 32-kg load, 400-m run with 18-kg load, 5- to 30-second rushes to and from prone position, 80-kg casualty drag, obstacle course). When compared with traditional military physical training programs, PRT consistently resulted in fewer injuries and in equal or greater improvements in fitness and military task performance. Verf.-Referat