A confirmatory study of rating scale category effectiveness for the Coaching Efficacy Scale

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Eine Untersuchung zur Bestätigung der Effektivität der Kategorien der Skaleneinteilungen bei einem Messverfahren zur Trainingswirksamkeit
Autor:Myers, Nicholas D.; Feltz, Deborah L.; Wolfe, Edward W.
Erschienen in:Research quarterly for exercise and sport
Veröffentlicht:79 (2008), 3, S. 300-311, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0270-1367, 2168-3824
DOI:10.1080/02701367.2008.10599493
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU200905002313
Quelle:BISp
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Myers, Nicholas D.
A2  - Myers, Nicholas D.
A2  - Feltz, Deborah L.
A2  - Wolfe, Edward W.
DB  - BISp
DP  - BISp
KW  - Effektivität
KW  - Evaluation
KW  - Fragebogen
KW  - Kinder- und Jugendsport
KW  - Messgenauigkeit
KW  - Messverfahren
KW  - Methodik
KW  - Ratingskala
KW  - Selbsteinschätzung
KW  - Trainer
KW  - Trainerarbeit
KW  - Trainingswissenschaft
KW  - Validität
LA  - eng
TI  - A confirmatory study of rating scale category effectiveness for the Coaching Efficacy Scale
TT  - Eine Untersuchung zur Bestätigung der Effektivität der Kategorien der Skaleneinteilungen bei einem Messverfahren zur Trainingswirksamkeit
PY  - 2008
N2  - This study extended validity evidence for measures of coaching efficacy derived from the Coaching Efficacy Scale (CES) by testing the rating scale categorizations suggested in previous research. Previous research provided evidence for the effectiveness of a four-category (4-CAT) structure for high school and collegiate sports coaches; it also suggested that a five-category (5-CAT) structure may be effective for youth sports coaches, because they may be more likely to endorse categories on the lower end of the scale. Coaches of youth sports (N=492) responded to the CES items with a 5-CAT structure. Across rating scale category effectiveness guidelines, 32 of 34 evidences (94 percent) provided support for this structure. Data were condensed to a 4-CAT structure by collapsing responses in Category 1 (CAT-1) and Category 2 (CAT-2). Across rating scale category effectiveness guidelines, 25 of 26 evidences (96 percent) provided support for this structure. Findings provided confirmatory, cross-validation evidence for both the 5-CAT and 4-CAT structures. For empirical, theoretical, and practical reasons, the authors concluded that the 4-CAT structure was preferable to the 5-CAT when CES items are used to measure coaching efficacy. This conclusion is based on the findings of this confirmatory study and the more exploratory findings of Myers, Wolfe, and Feltz (2005). Verf.-Referat
L2  - https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2008.10599493
DO  - 10.1080/02701367.2008.10599493
SP  - S. 300-311
SN  - 0270-1367
JO  - Research quarterly for exercise and sport
IS  - 3
VL  - 79
M3  - Gedruckte Ressource
M3  - Elektronische Ressource (online)
ID  - PU200905002313
ER  -