A comparison between cyclists and noncyclists of joint torque of the lower extremities during pedaling

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Vergleich zwischen Radsportlern und Nichtradsportlern hinsichtlich der Gelenkkraftmomente der unteren Extremitäten bei Pedalarbeit
Autor:Hoshikawa, Hidetoshi; Tamaki, Keiichi; Kimura, Yuichi; Saito, Hirokazu; Satoh, Yoshiro; Nakamura, Yoshio; Muraoka, Isao; Fujimoto, Hiroshi
Erschienen in:Japanese journal of physical fitness and sports medicine
Veröffentlicht:48 (1999), 5, S. 547-558, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Japanisch
ISSN:0039-906X, 1881-4751
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU200008000076
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect between cyclists and noncyclists of pedal rates on ankle, knee, and hip joint torque during pedaling exercises. Six male cyclists (CY) and seven male noncyclists (NC) pedaled at 40, 60, 90 and 120 rpm with a power output of 200 W. The lower limb was modeled as three rigid segment links constrained to plane motion. Based on the Newton-Euler method, the equation for each segment was constructed and solved on a computer using pedal force, pedal, crank, and lower limb position data to calculate torque at the ankle, knee, and hip joints. The average plantar flexor torque decreased with increasing pedal rates in both groups. The average knee extensor torque for CY decreased up to 90 rpm, and then leveled off at 120 rpm. These results were similar to NC. The average knee flexor torque in both groups remained steady over all pedal rates. The average hip extensor torque for CY decreased significantly up to 90 rpm where it showed the lowest value, but increased at 120 rpm. For NC, the average hip extensor torque did not decrease at 90 rpm compared with 60 rpm, and was significantly higher than CY at 120 rpm (CY: 28.1+/-9.0 Nm, NC: 38.6+/-6.7 Nm, p<0.05). The average hip flexor torque for NC at 120 rpm increased significanly from 90 rpm, and was significantly higher than CY (CY: 11.6+/-2.9 Nm, NC: 22.6+/-11.8 Nm, p<0.05). These results suggest that it would be better for cyclists to select a pedal rate of between 90 to 110 rpm to minimize joint torque, and, as a result, reduce peripheral muscle fatigue. Verf.-Referat