Comparison of open versus closed kinetic chain test positions for measuring joint position sense

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Vergleich von Versuchsanordnungen der offenen versus geschlossenen kinetischen Kette in der Messung des Gelenkstellungsempfindens
Autor:Andersen, Susan B.; Terwilliger, Donna M.; Denegar, Craig R.
Erschienen in:Journal of sport rehabilitation
Veröffentlicht:4 (1995), 3, S. 165-171, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1056-6716, 1543-3072
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU199511103996
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

The purpose of this study was to determine if a difference exists in the reproducibility of knee joint flexion angles in an open versus a closed kinetic chain. Thirty generally healthy subjects (12 males, 18 females; mean age 23.8 years) participated. Subjects actively reproduced small, medium, and large knee flexion angles (with target angles of 15ø, 45ø, and 75ø, respectively) in an open and a closed kinetic chain while being videotaped. Goniometric measurements were taken from the videotape of initial and reproduced joint angles. Data were analyzed using ANOVA with repeated measures on kinetic chain test position and joint angle. Subjects more accurately reproduced knee flexion angles in a closed kinetic chain position. The main effect for angle and the interaction of angle and test position were nonsignificant. The results indicate that knee joint position is more accurately reproduced in closed kinetic chain. Closed kinetic chain testing is also a more functional assessment of joint position sense, and thus closed kinetic chain assessment of lower extremity joint position sense is recommended. Verf.-Referat