Vergleich von Gjessing- und Concept-II-Ruderergometern durch biologische Kalibrierung
| Title translated into English: | Comparison of Gjessing and Concept II rowing ergometers by biological calibration |
|---|---|
| Author: | Lauf, T.; Witkowski, D.; Emrich, G.; Braumann, Klaus-Michael |
| Editor: | Liesen, Heinz; Weiß, Michael; Baum, Matthias |
| Published in: | Regulations- und Repairmechanismen : 33. Deutscher Sportärztekongress Paderborn 1993 |
| Published: | Köln: Dt. Ärzte-Verl. (Verlag), 1994, 1994. S. 195-196, Lit., Lit. |
| Format: | Publications (Database SPOLIT) |
| Publication Type: | Compilation article |
| Media type: | Print resource |
| Language: | German |
| ISBN: | 3769103084 |
| Keywords: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Identification number: | PU199503075577 |
| Source: | BISp |
Author's abstract
In order to investigate the comparability of two types of rowing ergometers (Gjessing, GJE, and Concept II, CON) routine exercise tests with a workload increasing step by step (starting with 200 W, increase by 50 W every 3 min with an interruption of 30 sec) were carried out in a random order in 12 rowers. Lactic acid concentration (<lac>), heart rate (HR), and oxygen consumption (VO2) were measured at the end of each workload. Despite identical maximum values for HR, <lac> and VO2 under both conditions the maximum working capacity displayed on the ergometer was significantly different (324 +/- 33,2 W on the GJE and 362,5 +/- 45 W on the CON (p<0,01)). Significant differences were found in submaximum workloads. At 200 and 300 W resp. the values for HR, <lac> and VO2 were higher in GJE compared with CON (p<0,01). As regards the biomechanical and biological examination, further research is needed. Verf.-Referat