Abstract

The present use of bioelectric impedance is based upon the greater electrolyte content and conductivity of fat-free mass (FFM). The limitation of the whole body impedance approach may be the use of S2/R as an index of the conductive volume of the body. The use of body lengths that closely resemble the actual length of the conductor rather than stature can improve predictions of FFM. Theoretically, the specific resistivity approach to bioelectric impedance also provides a means of circumventing this problem. Another alternative is the estimation of whole body composition or the composition of body segments from measurements of the lengths and resistances of the segments and the use of the phase angle of the whole body and or body segments. Possible alternative methods for the use of bioelectric impedance would be the measurement of the composition of body segments, the determination of specific resistivities so that estimates of FFM can be calculated without the need for regression equations and the determination of the use of different current frequencies in measuring body composition with bioelectric impedance. Verf.-Referat