Doping control analysis at the Rio 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Dopinganalytik bei den Olympischen und Paralympischen Spielen 2016 in Rio
Autor:Pereira, Henrique Marcelo Gualberto; Figueiredo Sardela, Vinicius; Costa Padilha, Monica; Mirotti, Luciana; Casilli, Alessandro; Azamor de Oliveira, Fábio; Albuquerque Cavalcanti, Gustavo de; Martins Lisandro Rodrigues, Lucas; Dutra de Araujo, Amanda Lessa; Santos Levy, Rachel; Castelo Teixeira, Pedro Antonio; Gomes de Oliveira, Felipe Alves; Giordani Duarte, Ana Carolina; Dudenhoeffer Carneiro, Ana Carolina; Medeiros Evaristo, Joseph Albert; Cardoso dos Santos, Gustavo Ramalho; Verissimo da Costa, Giovanni Carlo; Lima Castro, Fernando de; Sousa Nogueira, Fabio Cesar; Bertão Scalco, Fernanda; Pizzatti, Luciana; Radler de Aquino Neto, Francisco
Erschienen in:Drug testing and analysis
Veröffentlicht:9 (2017), 11/12 (35th Cologne workshop: Advances in sports drug testing), S. 1658-1672, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1942-7603, 1942-7611
DOI:10.1002/dta.2329
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201803002063
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

This paper summarises the results obtained from the doping control analyses performed during the Summer XXXI Olympic Games (August 3–21, 2016) and the XV Paralympic Games (September 7–18, 2016). The analyses of all doping control samples were performed at the Brazilian Doping Control Laboratory (LBCD), a World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA)‐accredited laboratory located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A new facility at Rio de Janeiro Federal University (UFRJ) was built and fully operated by over 700 professionals, including Brazilian and international scientists, administrative staff, and volunteers. For the Olympic Games, 4913 samples were analysed. In 29 specimens, the presence of a prohibited substance was confirmed, resulting in adverse analytical findings (AAFs). For the Paralympic Games, 1687 samples were analysed, 12 of which were reported as AAFs. For both events, 82.8% of the samples were urine, and 17.2% were blood samples. In total, more than 31 000 analytical procedures were conducted. New WADA technical documents were fully implemented; consequently, state‐of‐the‐art analytical toxicology instrumentation and strategies were applied during the Games, including different types of mass spectrometry (MS) analysers, peptide, and protein detection strategies, endogenous steroid profile measurements, and blood analysis. This enormous investment yielded one of the largest Olympic legacies in Brazil and South America.