Upper quadrant field tests and isokinetic upper limb strength in overhead athletes

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Feldtest der oberen Extremität und isokinetische Kraft der oberen Extremität bei Sportlern aus Überkopfsportarten
Autor:Borms, Dorien; Maenhout, Annelies; Cools, Ann M.
Erschienen in:Journal of athletic training
Veröffentlicht:51 (2016), 10, S. 789-796, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1062-6050, 0160-8320, 1938-162X
DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.06
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201612009150
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Context: Isokinetic testing is used to determine possible deficits in upper extremity strength in overhead athletes. Given that isokinetic testing is restricted to a laboratory setting, field tests, such as the Seated Medicine Ball Throw (SMBT) and Upper Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-UQ), were developed to assess upper body performance. The relationships between these field tests and isokinetic strength have not been examined.
Objective: To investigate the relationship between isokinetic strength testing for shoulder external and internal rotation and elbow flexion and extension and SMBT distance and YBT-UQ performance in overhead athletes.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Institutional laboratory.
Patients or Other Participants: A total of 29 healthy overhead athletes (14 men, 15 women; age = 21.6 ± 2.5 years, height = 177.7 ± 9.7 cm, mass = 70.3 ± 11.5 kg).
Intervention(s): A Biodex dynamometer was used to measure the isokinetic strength of the shoulder and elbow muscles. Upper extremity performance was assessed using the SMBT and YBT-UQ.
Main Outcome Measure(s): We used Pearson correlation coefficients and coefficients of determination to analyze the relationship between SMBT and YBT-UQ performance and the isokinetic strength variables.
Results: We observed moderate to strong correlations between the SMBT and isokinetic shoulder and elbow strength (r range = 0.595−0.855) but no correlations between the YBT-UQ and isokinetic strength variables. The shared variance between these strength variables and the SMBT ranged from 35.4% to 64.5% for shoulder strength and 58.5% to 73.1% for elbow strength.
Conclusions: These findings suggested that the SMBT is a reliable, low-cost, and easy- and quick-to-administer alternative to isokinetic testing for evaluating upper extremity strength in a clinical setting. Performance on the YBT-UQ did not seem to be related to upper limb strength and, therefore, cannot be used for this purpose. Using the YBT-UQ for other purposes may have value.