Trunk and lower extremity kinematics during stair descent in women with or without patellofemoral pain

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Autor:Schwane, Brandi G.; Goerger, Benjamin M.; Goto, Shiho; Blackburn, J. Troy; Aguilar, Alain J.; Padua, Darin A.
Erschienen in:Journal of athletic training
Veröffentlicht:50 (2015), 7, S. 704-712, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Deutsch
ISSN:1062-6050, 0160-8320, 1938-162X
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.100
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201509006781
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

Context: There is limited evidence indicating the contribution of trunk kinematics to patellofemoral pain (PFP). A better understanding of the interaction between trunk and lower extremity kinematics in this population may provide new avenues for interventions to treat PFP. Objective: To compare trunk and lower extremity kinematics between participants with PFP and healthy controls during a stair-descent task.
Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Twenty women with PFP (age = 22.2 ± 3.1 years, height = 164.5 ± 9.2 cm, mass = 63.5 ± 13.6 kg) and 20 healthy women (age = 21.0 ± 2.6 years, height = 164.5 ± 7.1 cm, mass = 63.8 ± 12.7 kg). Intervention(s): Kinematics were recorded as participants performed stair descent at a controlled velocity. Main Outcome Measure(s): Three-dimensional joint displacement of the trunk, hip, and knee during the stance phase of stair descent for the affected leg was measured using a 7-camera infrared optical motion-capture system. Pretest and posttest pain were assessed using a visual analogue scale. Kinematic differences between groups were determined using independent-samples t tests. A 2 × 2 mixed-model analysis of variance (group = PFP, control; time = pretest, posttest) was used to compare knee pain. Results: We observed greater knee internal-rotation displacement for the PFP group (12.8° ± 7.2°) as compared with the control group (8.9° ± 4.4°). No other between-groups differences were observed for the trunk, hip, or other knee variables. Conclusions: We observed no difference in trunk kinematics between groups but did note differences in knee internal-rotation displacement. These findings contribute to the current knowledge of altered movement in those with PFP and provide direction for exercise interventions. Verf.-Referat