Dominant–non-dominant asymmetry of kicking a stationary and rolling ball in a futsal context

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Dominante und nicht dominate Seitenasymmetrie der Schußbewegung eines liegenden und eines sich bewegenden Balles beim Futsal
Autor:Barbieri, Fabio Augusto; Bucken Gobbi, Lilian Teresa; Santiago, Paulo Roberto Pereira; Cunha, Sergio Augusto
Erschienen in:Journal of sports sciences
Veröffentlicht:33 (2015), 13, S. 1411-1419, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0264-0414, 1466-447X
DOI:10.1080/02640414.2014.990490
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201508006365
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the characteristics of the asymmetries in the dominant and non-dominant limbs when kicking stationary and rolling balls. Ten experienced Brazilian amateur futsal players participated in this study. Each participant performed kicks under two conditions (stationary ball vs. rolling ball) with the dominant and non-dominant limbs (five kicks per condition per limb). We analysed the kicking accuracy, ball and foot velocities, angular joint displacement and velocity. The asymmetry between the dominant and non-dominant limbs was analysed by symmetry index and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. The results did not reveal any interaction between the condition and limb for ball velocity, foot velocity and accuracy. However, kicking with the dominant limb in both kicks showed higher ball velocity (stationary ball: dominant – 24.27 ± 2.21 m · s‒1 and non-dominant – 21.62 ± 2.26 m · s‒1; rolling ball: dominant – 23.88 ± 2.71 m · s‒1 and non-dominant – 21.42 ± 2.25 m · s‒1), foot velocity (stationary ball: dominant – 17.61 ± 1.87 m · s‒1 and non-dominant – 15.58 ± 2.69 m · s‒1; rolling ball: dominant – 17.25 ± 2.26 m · s‒1 and non-dominant – 14.77 ± 2.35 m · s‒1) and accuracy (stationary ball: dominant – 1.17 ± 0.84 m and non-dominant – 1.56 ± 1.30 m; rolling ball: dominant – 1.31 ± 0.91 m and non-dominant – 1.97 ± 1.44 m). In addition, the angular joint adjustments were dependent on the limb in both kicks (the kicks with non-dominant limb showed lower hip external rotation than the kicks with the dominant limb), indicating that the hip joint is important in kick performance. In conclusion, the kicks with the non-dominant limb showed different angular adjustments in comparison to kicks with the dominant limb. In addition, kicking a rolling ball with the non-dominant limb showed higher asymmetry for accuracy, indicating that complex kicks are more asymmetric. Verf.-Referat