Roller-massager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Anwendung eines Rollmassagegerätes auf dem Quadrizeps und Kniegelenkbeweglichkeit und neuromuskluläre Effizienz während eines Ausfallschrittes
Autor:Bradbury-Squires, David J.; Noftall, Jennifer C.; Sullivan, Kathleen M.; Behm, David G.; Power, Kevin E.; Button, Duane C.
Erschienen in:Journal of athletic training
Veröffentlicht:50 (2015), 2, S. 133-140, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1062-6050, 0160-8320, 1938-162X
DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-49.5.03
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201504002932
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

Context: Roller massagers are used as a recovery and rehabilitative tool to initiate muscle relaxation and improve range of motion (ROM) and muscular performance. However, research demonstrating such effects is lacking. Objective: To determine the effects of applying a roller massager for 20 and 60 seconds on knee-joint ROM and dynamic muscular performance. Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. Setting: University laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Ten recreationally active men (age ¼ 26.6 6 5.2 years, height ¼ 175.3 6 4.3 cm, mass ¼ 84.4 6 8.8 kg). Intervention(s): Participants performed 3 randomized experimental conditions separated by 24 to 48 hours. In condition 1 (5 repetitions of 20 seconds) and condition 2 (5 repetitions of 60 seconds), they applied a roller massager to the quadriceps muscles. Condition 3 served as a control condition in which participants sat quietly. Main Outcome Measure(s): Visual analog pain scale, electromyography (EMG) of the vastus lateralis (VL) and biceps femoris during roller massage and lunge, and kneejoint ROM. Results: We found no differences in pain between the 20- second and 60-second roller-massager conditions. During 60 seconds of roller massage, pain was 13.5% (5.7 6 0.70) and 20.6% (6.2 6 0.70) greater at 40 seconds and 60 seconds, respectively, than at 20 seconds (P , .05). During roller massage, VL and biceps femoris root mean square (RMS) EMG was 8% and 7%, respectively, of RMS EMG recorded during maximal voluntary isometric contraction. Knee-joint ROM was 10% and 16% greater in the 20-second and 60-second roller-massager conditions, respectively, than the control condition (P , .05). Finally, average lunge VL RMS EMG decreased as roller-massage time increased (P , .05). Conclusions: Roller massage was painful and induced muscle activity, but it increased knee-joint ROM and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge. Verf.-Referat