Emotional responses during repeated sprint intervals performed on level, downhill and uphill surfaces

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Emotionale Reaktionen während wiederholter Sprintintervalle auf gerader Strecke, bergauf und bergab
Autor:Baron, Bertrand; Guilloux, Bertrand; Begue, Mylène; Uriac, Stéphane
Erschienen in:Journal of sports sciences
Veröffentlicht:33 (2015), 5, S. 476-486, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0264-0414, 1466-447X
DOI:10.1080/02640414.2014.947523
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201503001952
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test emotional responses during sprint intervals performed on a level, down and up surface. Fifty trained participants performed a maximal effort during a 60-m sprint and 10 repetitions of 60 m running sprints on a level, down and up surface on a 5.9% slope. Running speeds, emotional responses and heart rate were measured. Self-selected speeds were correlated with the rating of perceived exertion, the affective balance, the desire to stop and the resources needed for the task in all conditions whereas the pleasure, the desire to continue and the capacity to realise the task were correlated with speeds only during level and uphill running. Mean values of emotional parameters were significantly different (P < 0.05) during running on a flat surface, downhill and uphill. When the gradient of running surface is changed, the pattern of emotional responses was just translated, i.e. most of the slope between the evolution of emotional parameters and the repetitions were not significantly different whereas Y-intercepts were different.
Consented effort is highly correlated with the resources needed for the task (P < 0.001, r2 = 0.72). We propose that the difference in the resources needed for the task between level, downhill and uphill running (F 2, 1499 = 166.5, P < 0.001, Eta2 = 0.18) is the most important key that explains our results. Verf.-Referat