Evidence that the cortical motor command for the initiation of dynamic plantarflexion consists of excitation followed by inhibition

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Der Nachweis, dass das kortikale Motorkommando der Einleitung der dynamischen Plantarflexion aus Erregung, gefolgt durch Hemmung, besteht
Autor:Taube, Wolfgang; Lundbye-Jensen, Jesper; Schubert, Martin; Gollhofer, Albert; Leukel, Christian
Erschienen in:PLoS one / Public Library of Science
Veröffentlicht:6 (2011), 10, Art.-ID e25657; [9 S.], Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0025657
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201409009293
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

At the onset of dynamic movements excitation of the motor cortex (M1) is spatially restricted to areas representing the involved muscles whereas adjacent areas are inhibited. The current study elucidates whether the cortical motor command for dynamic contractions is also restricted to a certain population of cortical neurons responsible for the fast corticospinal projections. Therefore, corticospinal transmission was assessed with high temporal resolution during dynamic contractions after both, magnetic stimulation over M1 and the brainstem. The high temporal resolution could be obtained by conditioning the soleus H-reflex with different interstimulus intervals by cervicomedullary stimulation (CMS-conditioning) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of M1 (M1-conditioning). This technique provides a precise time course of facilitation and inhibition. CMS- and M1-conditioning produced an ‘early facilitation’ of the H-reflex, which occurred around 3 ms earlier with CMS-conditioning. The early facilitation is believed to be caused by activation of direct monosynaptic projections to the spinal motoneurons. CMS-conditioning resulted in a subsequent ‘late facilitation’, which is considered to reflect activity of slow-conducting and/or indirect corticospinal pathways. In contrast, M1-conditioning produced a ‘late dis-facilitation’ or even ‘late inhibition’. As the late dis-facilitation was only seen following M1- but not CMS-conditioning, it is argued that cortical activation during dynamic tasks is restricted to fast, direct corticospinal projections whereas corticomotoneurons responsible for slow and/or indirectly projecting corticospinal pathways are inhibited. The functional significance of restricting the descending cortical drive to fast corticospinal pathways may be to ensure a temporally focused motor command during the execution of dynamic movements. Verf.-Referat