“I am” versus “we are” : effects of distinctive variants of self-talk on efficacy beliefs and motor performance

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:"Ich bin" im Gegensatz zu "Wir sind" : Einfluss der charakteristischen Variationen von Selbstgesprächen auf den Wirkungsglauben und die motorische Leistung
Autor:Son, Veronica; Jackson, Ben ; Grove, J. Robert; Feltz, Deborah L.
Erschienen in:Journal of sports sciences
Veröffentlicht:29 (2011), 13, S. 1417-1424, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0264-0414, 1466-447X
DOI:10.1080/02640414.2011.593186
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201404003886
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

Before completing a team-based dart-throwing activity, 80 undergraduates were randomly assigned to one of three preperformance self-talk conditions: (a) self-talk statements that focused upon one’s personal capabilities, (b) self-talk statements emphasizing the group’s capabilities, or (c) a control condition where neutral statements were implemented. Participants in all conditions subsequently rated their confidence in their own (i.e. self-efficacy) as well as their team’s (i.e. collective efficacy) capabilities, before carrying out the task. Overall, self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and performance indicators were all greatest for individuals who practised self-talk focusing on the group’s capabilities, as opposed to individual-focused and neutral conditions. Findings are considered with respect to their novel theoretical contribution to the social cognition literature and their implications for fostering efficacy perceptions and team performance. Verf.-Referat