Helsen, Gilis and Weston (2006) err in testing the optical error hypothesis
Gespeichert in:
| Deutscher übersetzter Titel: | Helsen, Gilis und Weston (2006) irren sich bei ihrem Test der "optischen Fehler-Hypothese" |
|---|---|
| Autor: | Oudejans, Raôul R.D.; Bakker, Frank C.; Beek, Peter J. |
| Erschienen in: | Journal of sports sciences |
| Veröffentlicht: | 25 (2007), 9, S. 987-990, Lit. |
| Format: | Literatur (SPOLIT) |
| Publikationstyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
| Medienart: | Gedruckte Ressource |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| ISSN: | 0264-0414, 1466-447X |
| DOI: | 10.1080/02640410600778610 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online Zugang: | |
| Erfassungsnummer: | PU201312008741 |
| Quelle: | BISp |
Abstract des Autors
In this commentary, we react to the recent study by Helsen, Gilis and Weston (2006) on judging offside in football. Helsen et al. claim that their data falsify the optical error hypothesis presented by Oudejans et al. (2000). However, as we will elucidate here, they misinterpret this hypothesis and present a data set that is seriously flawed, and hence not suited to test it. Therefore, their conclusions regarding the optical error hypothesis are in error. Verf.-Referat