Physical activity interventions and depression in children and adolescents : a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Depression und Interventionen zur Förderung körperlicher Aktivität bei Kindern und Jugendlichen : eine systematische Übersicht und Metaanalyse
Autor:Brown, Helen Elizabeth; Pearson, Natalie; Braithwaite, Rock E.; Brown, Wendy J.; Biddle, Stuart J.H.
Erschienen in:Sports medicine
Veröffentlicht:43 (2013), 3, S. 195-206, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0112-1642, 1179-2035
DOI:10.1007/s40279-012-0015-8
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201305003903
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

Context: Evidence suggests chronic physical activity (PA) participation may be both protective against the onset of and beneficial for reducing depressive symptoms. Objective: The aim of this article is to assess the impact of PA interventions on depression in children and adolescents using meta-analysis. Data sources: Published English language studies were located from manual and computerized searches of the following databases: PsycInfo, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Trials Register of Promoting Health Interventions (TRoPHI; EPPI Centre), Web of Science and MEDLINE. Study selection: Studies meeting inclusion criteria (1) reported on interventions to promote or increase PA; (2) included children aged 5–11 years and/or adolescents aged 12–19 years; (3) reported on results using a quantitative measure of depression; (4) included a non-physical control or comparison group; and (5) were published in peer-reviewed journals written in English, up to and including May 2011 (when the search was conducted). Data extraction: Studies were coded for methodological, participant and study characteristics. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version-2 software was used to compute effect sizes, with subgroup analyses to identify moderating characteristics. Study quality was assessed using the Delphi technique. Results: Nine studies were included (n = 581); most were school-based randomized controlled trials, randomized by individual. Studies used a variety of measurement tools to assess depressive symptoms. The summary treatment effect was small but significant (Hedges’ g = −0.26, standard error = 0.09, 95% confidence intervals = −0.43, −0.08, p = 0.004). Subgroup analyses showed that methodological (e.g. studies with both education and PA intervention; those with a higher quality score; and less than 3 months in duration) and participant characteristics (e.g. single-gender studies; those targeting overweight or obese groups) contributed most to the reduction in depression. Conclusions: There was a small significant overall effect for PA on depression. More outcome-focused, high-quality trials are required to effectively inform the implementation of programmes to reduce depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. Verf.-Referat