Tennis ranking related to exercise capacity

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Der Zusammenhang von Tennis-Weltrangliste und Trainingskapazität
Autor:Banzer, Winfried; Thiel, Christian; Rosenhagen, Andreas; Vogt, Lutz
Erschienen in:British journal of sports medicine
Veröffentlicht:42 (2008), 2, S. 152-154, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0306-3674, 1473-0480
DOI:10.1136/bjsm.2007.036798
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201101000179
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

The physical demands upon players in professional tennis have been increasing over the past few years. Currently, average intensities range between 60% and 70% of maximum oxygen uptake. Tennis can be classified as a mainly anaerobic activity with emphasis on glycolysis and glycogenolysis. However, taking into consideration incomplete physiological regeneration between points, as well as between matches and tournaments, a high cardiorespiratory capacity may help to avoid fatigue 3 and aid in recovery, thus promoting continuous success in professional tennis. The relative importance of aerobic capacity may depend on an individual athlete’s preferred strategy, as the proportion of playing time versus total match time varies with playing style. Average point duration may reach more than 15 seconds when baseline players are in control of a rally, as opposed to <5 seconds when attacking players are in control. Professional players have a cardiorespiratory capacity of 55–65 mL/min/kg. Players attend up to 40 tournaments/year, during which athletic training sessions are necessarily reduced in volume and intensity. Thus, the preparation period at the end of the year offers the best, if not the only chance to systematically develop athletic capabilities. Improving the aerobic capacity in this period may have a strong bearing on tennis performance. This study aimed to examine the relationship between VO 2max during preparation and the following year’s entry ranking, focusing on a single top athlete, to explore the research potential for future systematic evaluation. Einleitung