Injuries sustained by rugby players presenting to United States emergency departments, 1978 through 2004

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Verletzungen von Rugbyspielern, die eine Vorstellung in der Notaufnahme in den Vereinigten Staaten nach sich zogen, 1978 bis 2004
Autor:Elizabeth, Ellen; Comstock, R. Dawn
Erschienen in:Journal of athletic training
Veröffentlicht:41 (2006), 3, S. 325-331, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Elektronische Ressource (online) Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1062-6050, 0160-8320, 1938-162X
Schlagworte:
USA
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU201011008299
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

Context: Although the United States has nearly 60 000 rugby players, to date no nationally representative rugby injury studies have been conducted. Objective: To describe rugby players with injuries presenting to a representative sample of US emergency departments from 1978 through 2004. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: US Consumer Products Safety Commission's National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. Patients or Other Participants: Rugby players presenting to emergency departments in participating hospitals from October 1, 1978, through December 31, 2004. Main Outcome Measure(s): We reviewed all rugby players with injuries captured by the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System and categorized them by sex, age, injury site, and injury diagnosis. Results: An estimated 236 539 rugby players presented to US emergency departments from 1978 through 2004. Injured athletes tended to be male (87.2%) and older than 18 years of age (86.0%). The face (20.5%), shoulder (14.1%), head (11.5%), and ankle (9.1%) were the most frequently injured sites. Strain/sprain (24.3%), laceration (22.1%), fracture (18.7%), and contusion/abrasion (16.6%) were the most common diagnoses. Males presented with more face injuries (injury proportion ratio [IPR] = 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.54–2.72, P < .001) and more lacerations (IPR = 4.23, 95% CI = 2.87–6.22, P < .001) and dislocations (IPR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.51–3.13, P < .001). Females presented with more knee injuries (IPR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.36–2.06, P < .001) and more contusions/abrasions (IPR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.14–1.92, P < .001) and strains/sprains (IPR = 1.39, 95% = CI 1.16–1.67, P < .001). Those 18 years of age or younger presented with more concussions (IPR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.06–2.50, P < .001), while those over 18 presented with more lacerations (IPR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.30–2.57, P < .001). In males, fractures were more common among those 18 years of age or younger (IPR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.24–1.75, P < .001). Conclusions: Rugby injury patterns in the United States differed by age and sex. Understanding such patterns should assist certified athletic trainers in developing targeted preventive interventions. Verf.-Referat