Effect of prior exercise on the VO2/work rate relationship during incremental exercise and constant work rate exercise

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Auswirkung von vorangegangenem Training auf die Beziehung zwischen VO2 und Belastungsintensität während ansteigend intensiver körperlicher Belastung und Belastung bei gleichbleibend hoher Intensität
Autor:Marles, A.; Mucci, P.; Legrand, R.; Betbeder, D.; Prieur, F.
Erschienen in:International journal of sports medicine
Veröffentlicht:27 (2006), 5, S. 345-350, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0172-4622, 1439-3964
DOI:10.1055/s-2005-865665
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU200611002671
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

The disproportionate increase in VO2 ("extra VO2) reported at elevated intensity during incremental exercise (IE) might result from the same physiological mechanisms as the VO2 slow component observed during heavy constant work rate exercise (CWRE). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that prior heavy exercise can diminish the VO2 slow component. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether prior heavy exercise also alters the "extra VO2" during IE. Ten trained sprinters performed three tests on a cycle ergometer: Test 1 was an IE; Test 2 consisted of six minutes of a CWRE (90% of VO2max) followed by six minutes at 35 W and by an IE and Test 3 was composed of two CWRE of six minutes separated by six minutes of exercise at 35 W. For each IE, the slope and the intercept of the VO2/work rate relationship were calculated by linear regression using data before the first Ventilatory Threshold (pre-VT1 slope). The difference between VO2max measured and VO2max expected using the pre-LT slope was calculated (deltaVO2). We also calculated the difference between VO2 at min five and VO2 at min three during CWRE of Test 3 (deltaVO2(5' - 3')). VO2max was significantly higher than VO2exp during IE of Test 1 and Test 2. deltaVO2 during IE did not differ between Test 1 and Test 2 (+ 259 +/- 229 ml x min vs. + 222 +/- 221 ml x min). During Test 3, six subjects achieved five minutes of exercise during the second CWRE and deltaVO2(5' - 3') was significantly decreased during the second CWRE (338 +/- 65 ml x min vs. 68 +/- 98 ml x min, n=6). These results demonstrate that the amplitude of the "extra VO2"during IE was not affected by prior exercise, whereas the slow component of VO2 evaluated by deltaVO2(5' - 3') during CWRE was lowered. This implies that prior exercise does not have the same effect on the slow component of VO2 and on the "extra VO2". Therefore we were unable to demonstrate a relationship between the VO2 slow component and the extra-VO2 phenomenon during IE. Verf.-Referat