Is exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia in triathletes dependent on exercise modality?

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Ist belastungsbedingte arterielle Hypoxämie bei Triathleten abhängig von der Trainingsart?
Autor:Galy, O.; LeGallais, D.; Hue, O.; Boussana, A.; Préfaut, C.
Erschienen in:International journal of sports medicine
Veröffentlicht:26 (2005), 9, S. 719-726, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0172-4622, 1439-3964
DOI:10.1055/s-2005-837446
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU200607001705
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

To determine whether exercise modality affects arterial hypoxemia (EIAH) during training-intensity exercise, 13 triathletes performed 20 min of cycling (C) followed by 20 min of running (R): C-R, and two weeks later, 20 min of R followed by 20 min of C:R-C. Each trial was performed at an intensity slightly above the ventilatory threshold and close to the daily training intensity (75 % of VO2max). Ventilatory data were collected continuously using an automated breath-by-breath system. Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) was measured after each C and R segment and arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2) was monitored continuously via pulse oximetry. The metabolic rate was similar across modalities and trials, i.e., C-R (53.8 +/- 3.8 vs. 51.1 +/- 5.3 ml/min/kg and R-C (52.2 +/- 4.5 vs. 53.2 +/- 4.6 ml/min/kg. EIAH showed significantly greater severity for R compared to C irrespective of the order (p<0.05 for both trials). R values of PaO2 (and SpO2) for C-R and R-C were 88.7 +/- 6.0 mm Hg (93.0 +/- 0.6 % SpO2) and 86.6 +/- 7.3 mm Hg (93.5 +/- 0.6 % SpO2) and C values were 93.7 +/- 8.4 mm Hg (95.4 +/- 0.4 % SpO2) and 91.4 +/- 5.4 mm Hg (94.8 +/- 0.3 % SpO2). R ventilatory data described a significantly different breathing pattern than C, with higher respiratory rate (35.9 b/min vs. 51.1 b/min for C-R, p<0.01; and 50.0 b/min vs. 41.5 b/min for R-C, p<0.01) and lower tidal volume (2636 ml vs. 2282 ml for C-R, p<0.02 and 2272 ml vs. 2472 ml for R-C, p<0.05). We concluded that EIAH was greater during running than cycling for a similar metabolic rate corresponding to training intensity and that EIAH could thus be considered dependent on exercise modality. Verf.-Referat