Prospective evaluation of history and physical examination: variables to determine radiography in acute ankle injuries

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Prospektive Bewertung von Anamnese und koerperlicher Untersuchung: Faktoren, welche den Einsatz der Roentgendiagnostik bei akuten Sprunggelenkverletzungen bestimmen
Autor:Stricker, P.R.; Spindler, K.P.; Gautier, K.B.
Erschienen in:Clinical journal of sport medicine
Veröffentlicht:8 (1998), 3, S. 209-214, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:1050-642X, 1536-3724
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU199810304918
Quelle:BISp

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated history and physical findings among 74 patients with acute ankle injuries in order to determine factors significantly associated with fractures, excluding avulsion fragments <3 mm in size, and syndesmosis injuries and to determine factors that necessitate radiography. Design: This was a prospective study performed during a 12-month period. After recording history and physical examination data, a gestalt prediction of a positive or negative radiographic result was made before the patient underwent ankle radiography. Analysis then determined factors important for radiography. Patients and Setting: Patients who presented to a sports medicine center with an acute ankle injury were enrolled in the study after meeting the enrollment criteria. Main Outcome Measures: Before analysis, predictions for injury were based on accepted indicators. Outcome measures, factors that would indicate the need for radiography, were formulated after data collection and statistical analysis. Results: Radiographic findings showed nine fractures and three widened syndesmoses as well as 15 minor ligamentous avulsions. Statistical analysis showed significant association (p<0.05) of fracture with previous ankle fracture, syndesmosis pain with external rotation stress testing, and pain along the middle third of the distal fibula, from anterior to posterior. Syndesmosis injuries had a significant association with pain during external rotation stress testing. Conclusions: Although additional investigation with larger patient numbers would be beneficial, this study highlights the importance of history of previous fracture, pain on the distal mid-fibula or mid-tibia, and pain with external rotation. Furthermore, if these three variables are prospectively applied as criteria for radiography, a 55% reduction in radiography would result with 100% sensitivity. Finally, experienced sports medicine physicians had a 100% sensitivity, 68% specificity, 100% negative predictive value, and 39% positive predictive value for prediction of clinically significant fractures or syndesmosis injuries. Verf.-Referat