Combined exercise and motivation program: effect on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Ein kombiniert bewegungstherapeutisches und motivationsfoernderndes Programm: Auswirkung auf die Compliance und das Ausmass der Behinderung bei Patienten mit lumbalem Rueckenschmerz: eine randomisierte kontrollierte Untersuchung
Autor:Friedrich, M.; Gittler, G.; Halberstadt, Y.; Cermak, T.; Heiller, I.
Erschienen in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
Veröffentlicht:79 (1998), 5, S. 475-487, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0003-9993, 1532-821X
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU199807303285
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

Objective: To assess the effect of a combined exercise and motivation program on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic and recurrent low back pain. Design: A double-blind prospective randomized controlled trial. Setting: Physical therapy outpatient department, tertiary care. Patients: Ninety-three low back pain patients were randomly assigned to either a standard exercise program (n=49) or a combined exercise and motivation program (n=44). Interventions: Patients were prescribed 10 physical therapy sessions and were advised to continue exercising after treatment termination. The motivation program consisted of five compliance-enhancing interventions. Follow-up assessments were performed at 3 1/2 weeks, 4 months, and 12 months. Main Outcome Measures: Disability (low back outcome score), pain intensity, physical impairment (modified Waddell score, fingertip-to-floor distance, abdominal muscle strength), working ability, motivation, and compliance. Results: The patients in the motivation group were significantly more likely to attend their exercise therapy appointments (p=.0005). Four and 12 months after study entry there was a significant difference in favor of the motivation group with regard to the disability score (p=.018). No significant differences were found in motivation scores, self-reported compliance with long-term exercise, and modified Waddell score. In terms of working ability, there was a trend favoring the combined exercise and motivation program. Conclusion: The combined exercise and motivation program increased the rate of attendance at scheduled physical therapy sessions, ie, short-term compliance, and reduced disability and pain levels by the 12-month follow-up. However, there was no difference between the motivation and control groups with regard to long-term exercise compliance. Verf.-Referat