Reliability and precision of isokinetic strength and muscular endurance for the quadriceps and hamstrings

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Reliabilitaet und Praezision von isokinetischen Werten der Muskelkraft und -ausdauer des Quadriceps und der Hamstrings
Autor:Pincivero, D.M.; Lephart, S.M.; Karunakara, R.A.
Erschienen in:International journal of sports medicine
Veröffentlicht:18 (1997), 2, S. 113-117, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0172-4622, 1439-3964
DOI:10.1055/s-2007-972605
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU199703203194
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

The importance of accurately reproducing isokinetic strength values is critical for the assessment of training induced changes in muscle function. The purpose of this study was to determine the test re-test reliability of the Biodex System 2 Isokinetic Dynamometer for concentric quadriceps and hamstring strength and muscular endurance. Twenty-one healthy volunteers underwent isokinetic testing on 2 occasions separated by 7 days. Each subject performed 5 repetitions at 60 degrees/second followed by a muscular endurance test which consisted of 30 repetitions at 180 degrees/second. The results demonstrated high ICC values ranging from r=0.88 to r=0.97 and r=0.82 to r=0.96 for variables measured at 60 degrees/second and 180 degrees/second, respectively. SEM values were found to range from low to moderate, 4.8% to 11.6% and 5.6% to 10.8%, at 60 and 180 degrees/second, respectively. ICC coefficients were found to be low, r=0.52 to r=0.74, and SEM values were found to be high, 9.8% to 20.8%, for the work fatigue index at 180 degrees/second. The results demonstrate that isokinetric values obtained at 60 and 180 degrees/second are highly reproducible with the Biodex System 2 Dynamometer provided that adequate calibration, gravity correction and patient positioning is recorded and standardized. However, the work fatigue index as a measure of muscular endurance has not been shown to be reliable or precise. Changes in muscular strength over time should be considered valid if these differences lie beyond the SEM values reported in this study. Verf.-Referat