Effects of differing pedalling speeds on the power-duration relationship of high intensity cycle ergometry

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Auswirkungen verschiedener Pedaltretgeschwindigkeiten auf die Beziehung Wattleistung/Ausdauer bei hochintensiver Fahrradergometerbelastung
Autor:MacNaughton, L.; Thomas, D.
Erschienen in:International journal of sports medicine
Veröffentlicht:17 (1996), 4, S. 287-292, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0172-4622, 1439-3964
DOI:10.1055/s-2007-972848
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU199606108475
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

The aim of this experiment was to investigate the effects of differing pedalling speeds on the power-duration relationship during high intensity cycle ergometry with pedal cadences of 50 (low), 90 (intermediate) and 110 (high) r/min. Eight volunteer male subjects, aged 24+/-2.6 yr, with no competitive cycling training took part in this study and each undertook thirteen tests on a Lode BV Excalibur Sport V1.52 cycle ergometer over an eight week period. The first exercise bout was a 30 W/min incremental cycle at 50 r/min to volitional fatigue. This allowed the identification of a range of power outputs that would be used to construct and examine the power-duration relationships for each subject at 50, 90 and 110 r/min. At both 50 and 90 r/min, power outputs of 30 W above and below and 60 W above the highest work rate, as well as the maximum work rate achieved during the incremental exercise test were chosen, while at 110 r/min, the power outputs chosen were 25 W above and below as well as 50 W above the highest work rate achieved during the incremental exercise test and also the maximum work rate achieved during the incremental exercise test were chosen. These four work rates for each pedalling frequency were chosen because they would have exercise times to exhaustion in the range of 1-10 minutes. Each exercise bout was preceded by four minutes of unloaded cycling and then the work rate was adjusted quickly to the desired load setting by the previously programmed computerised ergometer. The results of this work indicate that for the group of subjects studied, pedalling a cycle ergometer at 50 r/min allows subjects to pedal for a significantly greater time than when pedalling at either 90 or 110 r/min. Our hypothesis, that endurance performance was reduced when recreational cyclists pedal at a high cadence when compared to a low cadence was correct. Maximum sustainable power output during cycle ergometry was higher at 50 r/min than at either 90 or 110 r/min. At the intermediate cadence endurance was better than at the high but worse than at the low cadence. In conclusion, during endurance cycling, recreational cyclists should pedal at lower rather than higher cadences. Verf.-Referat