Differences in anaerobic performance between boys and men

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Deutscher übersetzter Titel:Unterschiede in der anaeroben Leistungsfaehigkeit zwischen Jungen und Maennern
Autor:Gaul, C.A.; Docherty, D.; Cicchini, R.
Erschienen in:International journal of sports medicine
Veröffentlicht:16 (1995), 7, S. 451-455, Lit.
Format: Literatur (SPOLIT)
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Medienart: Gedruckte Ressource Elektronische Ressource (online)
Sprache:Englisch
ISSN:0172-4622, 1439-3964
DOI:10.1055/s-2007-973036
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:
Erfassungsnummer:PU199510103483
Quelle:BISp

Abstract des Autors

The purpose of this study was to compare the anaerobic performance of 11-12 year old prepubescent boys (stage 1; n=18) using a maximal effort 90s cycling test to that of adult men (n=19). Performance was separated into short-term anaerobic power (SAP; work in 10 s), intermediate-term anaerobic capacity (IAC; work in 30 s) and long-term anaerobic capacity (LAC; work in 90 s). Resistance on the Monark cycle ergometer was chosen as the highest tolerable load for the 90s test and set at 2.6 and 3.8J/rev/kg body mass for boys and men, respectively. Power drop-off (%PD) was determined as the change in 5s power outputs from 0-90s. Blood lactates were measured at rest (pretest; BL) and at 2 (BL2) and 5 (BL5) min post test. Absolute and relative (to weight or thigh volume) scores for SAP, IAC and LAC were 33-40% lower in the boys compared to the men. The men demonstrated significantly greater %PD over the 90s (32.2%) compared to the 25.3% PD of the boys, suggesting that the development of fatigue was greater in the men even though power and work outputs were high. Resting BL values were similar for both groups. Mean BL2 and BL5 were higher in the men than in the boys. The anaerobic performance of the boys compared to the men cannot be completely explained by the lower resistance setting used. Although the boys were 50% lighter than the men, their resistance was 70% of that used for the men. The results do not support the contention that children and adults have similar abilities in short term, exhaustive work when corrected for size. Prepubescent boys appear to be limited in their ability to perform short-term as well as intermediate and long term anaerobic exercise compared to adult males. Verf.-Referat